Performance

All the tests were done on an Arch Linux x86_64 machine with an Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU (1.90GHz).

Empirical likelihood computation

We show the performance of computing empirical likelihood with el_mean(). We test the computation speed with simulated data sets in two different settings: 1) the number of observations increases with the number of parameters fixed, and 2) the number of parameters increases with the number of observations fixed.

Increasing the number of observations

We fix the number of parameters at \(p = 10\), and simulate the parameter value and \(n \times p\) matrices using rnorm(). In order to ensure convergence with a large \(n\), we set a large threshold value using el_control().

library(ggplot2)
library(microbenchmark)
set.seed(3175775)
p <- 10
par <- rnorm(p, sd = 0.1)
ctrl <- el_control(th = 1e+10)
result <- microbenchmark(
  n1e2 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(100 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl),
  n1e3 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(1000 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl),
  n1e4 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(10000 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl),
  n1e5 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(100000 * p), ncol = p), par = par, control = ctrl)
)

Below are the results:

result
#> Unit: microseconds
#>  expr       min          lq        mean      median          uq        max
#>  n1e2   234.460    302.1510    373.6669    320.8585    417.2280   1536.523
#>  n1e3   671.732    807.5395    972.1824    874.4095    987.2785   3200.575
#>  n1e4  6000.853   6946.9595   8348.2756   8386.2720   8927.1690  14484.319
#>  n1e5 98294.881 119112.9660 141492.2065 135770.8385 158217.3825 250879.821
#>  neval cld
#>    100 a  
#>    100 a  
#>    100  b 
#>    100   c
autoplot(result)
#> Warning: `aes_string()` was deprecated in ggplot2 3.0.0.
#> ℹ Please use tidy evaluation idioms with `aes()`.
#> ℹ See also `vignette("ggplot2-in-packages")` for more information.
#> ℹ The deprecated feature was likely used in the microbenchmark package.
#>   Please report the issue at
#>   <https://github.com/joshuaulrich/microbenchmark/issues/>.
#> This warning is displayed once per session.
#> Call `lifecycle::last_lifecycle_warnings()` to see where this warning was
#> generated.

Increasing the number of parameters

This time we fix the number of observations at \(n = 1000\), and evaluate empirical likelihood at zero vectors of different sizes.

n <- 1000
result2 <- microbenchmark(
  p5 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 5), ncol = 5),
    par = rep(0, 5),
    control = ctrl
  ),
  p25 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 25), ncol = 25),
    par = rep(0, 25),
    control = ctrl
  ),
  p100 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 100), ncol = 100),
    par = rep(0, 100),
    control = ctrl
  ),
  p400 = el_mean(matrix(rnorm(n * 400), ncol = 400),
    par = rep(0, 400),
    control = ctrl
  )
)

result2
#> Unit: microseconds
#>  expr        min         lq        mean     median          uq        max neval
#>    p5    388.170    414.689    446.6975    435.880    455.5445    930.028   100
#>   p25   1512.096   1580.373   1704.1301   1618.374   1660.6980   4163.272   100
#>  p100  12591.266  14003.357  15580.4129  15179.541  16906.3635  26745.613   100
#>  p400 150227.622 168663.182 190669.4652 180792.523 207859.6070 364876.468   100
#>  cld
#>  a  
#>  a  
#>   b 
#>    c
autoplot(result2)

On average, evaluating empirical likelihood with a 100000×10 or 1000×400 matrix at a parameter value satisfying the convex hull constraint takes less than a second.