class_0 <- sample(1:2^K, N, replace = L)
Alphas_0 <- matrix(0,N,K)
for(i in 1:N){
Alphas_0[i,] <- inv_bijectionvector(K,(class_0[i]-1))
}
thetas_true = rnorm(N,0,1)
tausd_true=0.5
taus_true = rnorm(N,0,tausd_true)
G_version = 3
phi_true = 0.8
lambdas_true <- c(-2, 1.6, .4, .055) # empirical from Wang 2017
Alphas <- sim_alphas(model="HO_sep",
lambdas=lambdas_true,
thetas=thetas_true,
Q_matrix=Q_matrix,
Design_array=Design_array)
table(rowSums(Alphas[,,5]) - rowSums(Alphas[,,1])) # used to see how much transition has taken place
#>
#> 0 1 2 3 4
#> 71 57 77 118 27
itempars_true <- matrix(runif(J*2,.1,.2), ncol=2)
RT_itempars_true <- matrix(NA, nrow=J, ncol=2)
RT_itempars_true[,2] <- rnorm(J,3.45,.5)
RT_itempars_true[,1] <- runif(J,1.5,2)
Y_sim <- sim_hmcdm(model="DINA",Alphas,Q_matrix,Design_array,
itempars=itempars_true)
L_sim <- sim_RT(Alphas,Q_matrix,Design_array,RT_itempars_true,taus_true,phi_true,G_version)output_HMDCM_RT_sep = hmcdm(Y_sim,Q_matrix,"DINA_HO_RT_sep",Design_array,
100, 30,
Latency_array = L_sim, G_version = G_version,
theta_propose = 2,deltas_propose = c(.45,.35,.25,.06))
#> 0
output_HMDCM_RT_sep
#>
#> Model: DINA_HO_RT_sep
#>
#> Sample Size: 350
#> Number of Items:
#> Number of Time Points:
#>
#> Chain Length: 100, burn-in: 50
summary(output_HMDCM_RT_sep)
#>
#> Model: DINA_HO_RT_sep
#>
#> Item Parameters:
#> ss_EAP gs_EAP
#> 0.1374 0.2150
#> 0.1424 0.1595
#> 0.1233 0.1096
#> 0.2749 0.1359
#> 0.1290 0.1249
#> ... 45 more items
#>
#> Transition Parameters:
#> lambdas_EAP
#> λ0 -1.77376
#> λ1 1.72156
#> λ2 0.31811
#> λ3 0.06084
#>
#> Class Probabilities:
#> pis_EAP
#> 0000 0.1788
#> 0001 0.1467
#> 0010 0.1963
#> 0011 0.2195
#> 0100 0.1811
#> ... 11 more classes
#>
#> Deviance Information Criterion (DIC): 150342.6
#>
#> Posterior Predictive P-value (PPP):
#> M1: 0.522
#> M2: 0.49
#> total scores: 0.6248
a <- summary(output_HMDCM_RT_sep)
head(a$ss_EAP)
#> [,1]
#> [1,] 0.1373749
#> [2,] 0.1424053
#> [3,] 0.1232890
#> [4,] 0.2748912
#> [5,] 0.1290272
#> [6,] 0.1054255(cor_thetas <- cor(thetas_true,a$thetas_EAP))
#> [,1]
#> [1,] 0.7971607
(cor_taus <- cor(taus_true,a$response_times_coefficients$taus_EAP))
#> [,1]
#> [1,] 0.9871244
(cor_ss <- cor(as.vector(itempars_true[,1]),a$ss_EAP))
#> [,1]
#> [1,] 0.6501642
(cor_gs <- cor(as.vector(itempars_true[,2]),a$gs_EAP))
#> [,1]
#> [1,] 0.6018308
AAR_vec <- numeric(L)
for(t in 1:L){
AAR_vec[t] <- mean(Alphas[,,t]==a$Alphas_est[,,t])
}
AAR_vec
#> [1] 0.9357143 0.9442857 0.9628571 0.9714286 0.9707143
PAR_vec <- numeric(L)
for(t in 1:L){
PAR_vec[t] <- mean(rowSums((Alphas[,,t]-a$Alphas_est[,,t])^2)==0)
}
PAR_vec
#> [1] 0.7857143 0.8028571 0.8685714 0.8914286 0.8914286a$DIC
#> Transition Response_Time Response Joint Total
#> D_bar 2270.545 129443.8 14656.79 3076.427 149447.6
#> D(theta_bar) 1970.497 129005.2 14528.03 3048.882 148552.6
#> DIC 2570.594 129882.5 14785.56 3103.972 150342.6
head(a$PPP_total_scores)
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
#> [1,] 0.34 0.36 0.20 0.84 0.44
#> [2,] 0.80 0.44 0.56 1.00 0.50
#> [3,] 0.80 0.80 0.50 1.00 0.86
#> [4,] 0.30 0.62 0.70 0.74 0.86
#> [5,] 0.98 0.54 0.70 0.28 1.00
#> [6,] 0.30 0.58 0.68 0.98 0.82
head(a$PPP_item_means)
#> [1] 0.50 0.50 0.42 0.44 0.50 0.60
head(a$PPP_item_ORs)
#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10] [,11] [,12] [,13] [,14]
#> [1,] NA 0.46 0.16 0.72 0.48 0.12 0.66 0.78 0.60 0.00 0.02 0.30 0.72 0.86
#> [2,] NA NA 0.36 0.94 0.44 0.58 0.64 0.74 0.70 0.30 0.52 0.60 0.58 0.18
#> [3,] NA NA NA 0.48 0.10 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.74 0.50 0.64 0.26 0.42 0.84
#> [4,] NA NA NA NA 0.66 0.78 0.84 0.50 0.76 0.30 0.16 0.42 0.16 0.68
#> [5,] NA NA NA NA NA 0.48 0.48 0.56 0.38 0.10 0.40 0.74 0.78 0.34
#> [6,] NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.64 0.44 0.84 0.96 0.54 0.94 0.70 0.58
#> [,15] [,16] [,17] [,18] [,19] [,20] [,21] [,22] [,23] [,24] [,25] [,26]
#> [1,] 0.08 0.34 0.44 0.76 0.58 0.28 0.92 0.28 0.62 0.78 0.08 0.86
#> [2,] 0.80 0.04 0.38 0.92 0.36 0.56 0.52 0.44 0.96 0.20 0.50 0.22
#> [3,] 0.38 0.08 0.00 0.80 0.70 0.28 0.08 0.30 0.40 0.64 0.26 0.36
#> [4,] 0.50 0.12 0.94 0.40 0.22 0.40 0.24 0.32 0.52 0.02 0.40 0.70
#> [5,] 0.08 0.28 0.46 0.96 0.16 0.54 0.90 0.56 0.60 0.66 0.72 0.94
#> [6,] 0.88 0.08 0.98 0.88 1.00 0.98 0.68 0.28 0.88 0.68 0.46 0.74
#> [,27] [,28] [,29] [,30] [,31] [,32] [,33] [,34] [,35] [,36] [,37] [,38]
#> [1,] 0.46 0.10 0.84 0.06 0.70 0.94 0.34 0.96 0.02 0.58 0.36 0.84
#> [2,] 0.92 0.30 0.14 0.38 0.36 0.38 0.80 0.46 0.04 0.04 0.52 0.48
#> [3,] 0.66 0.26 0.46 0.12 0.28 0.36 0.72 0.40 0.18 0.58 0.30 0.24
#> [4,] 0.32 0.46 0.72 0.60 0.34 0.16 0.94 0.94 0.42 0.14 0.74 0.60
#> [5,] 0.42 0.92 0.34 0.60 0.66 1.00 0.82 0.84 0.70 0.62 0.90 0.88
#> [6,] 0.62 0.42 0.30 0.62 0.06 0.60 0.84 0.20 0.72 0.06 0.68 0.60
#> [,39] [,40] [,41] [,42] [,43] [,44] [,45] [,46] [,47] [,48] [,49] [,50]
#> [1,] 0.42 0.14 0.80 0.98 0.92 0.42 0.42 1.00 0.80 0.44 0.78 0.52
#> [2,] 0.96 0.46 0.74 0.68 0.70 0.72 0.88 0.86 0.78 0.22 0.76 0.28
#> [3,] 0.22 0.20 0.56 0.44 0.46 0.74 0.60 0.16 0.20 0.66 0.02 0.58
#> [4,] 0.76 0.88 0.42 0.92 0.36 0.26 0.56 0.58 0.22 0.16 0.34 0.80
#> [5,] 1.00 0.46 0.90 0.80 0.62 0.68 0.76 0.64 0.44 0.36 0.52 0.22
#> [6,] 0.82 0.74 0.42 0.68 0.44 0.76 0.36 0.72 0.34 0.00 0.44 0.62
library(bayesplot)
#> This is bayesplot version 1.16.0
#> - Online documentation and vignettes at mc-stan.org/bayesplot
#> - bayesplot theme set to bayesplot::theme_default()
#> * Does _not_ affect other ggplot2 plots
#> * See ?bayesplot_theme_set for details on theme setting
pp_check(output_HMDCM_RT_sep, type="total_latency")