{"High Initial Accuracy":{"train":{"words":[[2],[4],[6],[8],[10],[12],[14],[16],[18],[1],[3],[5],[7],[9],[11],[13],[15],[17],[2,12],[4,8],[3,7],[15,9],[11,5],[18,13],[6,10],[17,14],[16,1],[2,8],[9,1],[3,16],[10,4],[6,18],[15,11],[14,13],[17,5],[12,7],[18,2],[14,9],[4,12],[7,8],[15,1],[10,11],[6,3],[17,5],[13,16]],"objects":[[2],[15],[6],[11],[10],[7],[14],[16],[18],[1],[3],[5],[12],[9],[8],[13],[4],[17],[2,12],[4,8],[3,7],[15,9],[11,5],[18,13],[6,10],[17,14],[16,1],[2,8],[9,1],[3,16],[10,4],[6,18],[15,11],[14,13],[17,5],[12,7],[18,2],[14,9],[4,12],[7,8],[15,1],[10,11],[6,3],[17,5],[13,16]]},"test":[],"accuracy":[0.5294,0.7353,0.5294,0.3235,0.5,0.5588,0.3529,0.4118,0.4706,0.6765,0.2941,0.2353,0.5294,0.5882,0.2059,0.5294,0.5588,0.5294],"n_subj":[34],"label":["High Initial Accuracy"],"condition":["High Initial Accuracy"],"description":["Kachergis, Grimmick, & Gureckis, 'Modeling error-driven cross-situational word learning' (unpublished ms.). 18 word-object pairs: familiarized one at a time (the first 18 training trials), then studied cross-situationally (2 words + 2 objects/trial, 27 trials, 3 exposures/pair). In the High Initial Accuracy condition, 12 of 18 words are familiarized with the object they are later studied with ('initially accurate'); the rest are familiarized with a different object. Objects are indexed by the word they are studied with, so the diagonal m[w, w] is the study (= test-correct) pairing; an initially inaccurate word's familiarization object is off-diagonal. Test is 19AFC; accuracy is the group mean per tested word (n_subj participants, after excluding 5 who reported using a memory aid and 4 with median test response times under 400 ms)."],"response_matrix":{}},"Low Initial Accuracy":{"train":{"words":[[2],[4],[6],[8],[10],[12],[14],[16],[18],[1],[3],[5],[7],[9],[11],[13],[15],[17],[2,5],[7,9],[18,13],[10,15],[4,11],[16,14],[8,17],[12,6],[1,3],[9,3],[2,12],[5,4],[10,13],[11,6],[16,18],[8,17],[1,15],[7,14],[9,7],[6,17],[13,5],[3,2],[12,8],[4,14],[16,15],[18,1],[11,10]],"objects":[[17],[15],[6],[11],[10],[7],[14],[3],[1],[18],[16],[5],[12],[9],[8],[13],[4],[2],[2,5],[7,9],[18,13],[10,15],[4,11],[16,14],[8,17],[12,6],[1,3],[9,3],[2,12],[5,4],[10,13],[11,6],[16,18],[8,17],[1,15],[7,14],[9,7],[6,17],[13,5],[3,2],[12,8],[4,14],[16,15],[18,1],[11,10]]},"test":[],"accuracy":[0.4074,0.3333,0.2963,0.4074,0.4444,0.5556,0.2593,0.4074,0.5556,0.5185,0.3333,0.4815,0.5556,0.6296,0.5556,0.3704,0.4444,0.3704],"n_subj":[27],"label":["Low Initial Accuracy"],"condition":["Low Initial Accuracy"],"description":["Kachergis, Grimmick, & Gureckis, 'Modeling error-driven cross-situational word learning' (unpublished ms.). 18 word-object pairs: familiarized one at a time (the first 18 training trials), then studied cross-situationally (2 words + 2 objects/trial, 27 trials, 3 exposures/pair). In the Low Initial Accuracy condition, 6 of 18 words are familiarized with the object they are later studied with ('initially accurate'); the rest are familiarized with a different object. Objects are indexed by the word they are studied with, so the diagonal m[w, w] is the study (= test-correct) pairing; an initially inaccurate word's familiarization object is off-diagonal. Test is 19AFC; accuracy is the group mean per tested word (n_subj participants, after excluding 5 who reported using a memory aid and 4 with median test response times under 400 ms)."],"response_matrix":{}}}