Title: | Kriging-Based Inversion for Deterministic and Noisy Computer Experiments |
---|---|
Description: | Criteria and algorithms for sequentially estimating level sets of a multivariate numerical function, possibly observed with noise. |
Authors: | Clement Chevalier [aut], Dario Azzimonti [aut, cre] , David Ginsbourger [aut] , Victor Picheny [aut] , Yann Richet [ctb] |
Maintainer: | Dario Azzimonti <[email protected]> |
License: | GPL-3 |
Version: | 1.4.2 |
Built: | 2024-12-05 06:58:04 UTC |
Source: | CRAN |
Kriging-based sequential algorithms, meant to identify the excursion set of a real valued function. The algorithms can also identify one or several level sets.
Package: | KrigInv |
Type: | Package |
Version: | 1.4.1 |
Date: | 2018-09-04 |
License: | GPL version 3 |
LazyLoad: | yes |
Important functions are EGI
and EGIparallel
. The last 1.4 version allows to handle multiple thresholds T, stored in an array and implements conservative excursion set strategies.
A first prototype of this package was originally developed by D. Ginsbourger in the frame of a collaboration with IRSN (Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire), acting through Yann Richet. The three main authors thank IRSN for sponsoring open source research, and allowing them to spread the present package and publish it on CRAN. They also would like to warmly thank Yann Richet for numerous discussions concerning this package, and more!
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Victor Picheny (INRA, Toulouse, France)
David Ginsbourger (IDIAP Martigny and University of Bern, Switzerland)
Dario Azzimonti (IDSIA, Switzerland)
with contributions from Yann Richet (IRSN, France)
Maintainer: Clement Chevalier ([email protected])
Azzimonti, D., Ginsbourger, D., Chevalier, C., Bect, J., and Richet, Y. (2018). Adaptive design of experiments for conservative estimation of excursion sets. Under revision. Preprint at hal-01379642
Chevalier C., Picheny V., Ginsbourger D. (2014), Kriginv: An efficient and user-friendly implementation of batch sequential inversion strategies based on kriging (2014) Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, vol. 71, pp 1021-1034
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
Chevalier C., Ginsbourger D. (2014), Corrected Kriging update formulae for batch-sequential data assimilation, in Pardo-Iguzquiza, E., et al. (Eds.) Mathematics of Planet Earth, pp 119-122
Chevalier C. (2013) Fast uncertainty reduction strategies relying on Gaussian process models Ph.D Thesis, University of Bern
Picheny V., Ginsbourger D., Roustant O., Haftka R.T., (2010) Adaptive designs of experiments for accurate approximation of a target region, J. Mech. Des. vol. 132(7)
Picheny V. (2009) Improving accuracy and compensating for uncertainty in surrogate modeling, Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida and Ecole Nationale Superieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne
Bichon B.J., Eldred M.S., Swiler L.P., Mahadevan S., McFarland J.M. (2008) Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions, AIAA Journal 46(10), pp 2459-2468
Ranjan P., Bingham D., Michailidis G. (2008) Sequential experiment design for contour estimation from complex computer codes Technometrics 50(4), pp 527-541
Evaluation of Bichon's Expected Feasibility criterion. To be used in optimization routines, like in max_infill_criterion
.
bichon_optim(x, model, T, method.param = 1)
bichon_optim(x, model, T, method.param = 1)
x |
Input vector at which one wants to evaluate the criterion. This argument can be either a vector of size d (for an evaluation at a single point) or a p*d matrix (for p simultaneous evaluations of the criterion at p different points). |
model |
An object of class |
T |
Target value (scalar). |
method.param |
Scalar tolerance around the target T. Default value is 1. |
Bichon EF criterion.
When the argument x
is a vector, the function returns a scalar.
When the argument x
is a p*d matrix, the function returns a vector of size p.
Victor Picheny (INRA, Toulouse, France)
David Ginsbourger (IDIAP Martigny and University of Bern, Switzerland)
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Bichon B.J., Eldred M.S., Swiler L.P., Mahadevan S., McFarland J.M. (2008) Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions, AIAA Journal 46(10), pp 2459-2468
#bichon_optim set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") x <- c(0.5,0.4) #one evaluation of the bichon criterion bichon_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) n.grid <- 20 # resolution. You may use a larger value. x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) bichon.grid <- bichon_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) z.grid <- matrix(bichon.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, DOE points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,25,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.max(bichon.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of Bichon criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
#bichon_optim set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") x <- c(0.5,0.4) #one evaluation of the bichon criterion bichon_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) n.grid <- 20 # resolution. You may use a larger value. x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) bichon.grid <- bichon_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) z.grid <- matrix(bichon.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, DOE points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,25,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.max(bichon.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of Bichon criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
Computes kriging covariances between some new points and many integration points, using precomputed data.
computeQuickKrigcov(model,integration.points,X.new, precalc.data, F.newdata , c.newdata)
computeQuickKrigcov(model,integration.points,X.new, precalc.data, F.newdata , c.newdata)
model |
A Kriging model of |
integration.points |
p*d matrix of fixed integration points in the X space. |
X.new |
q*d matrix of new points. The calculated covariances are the covariances between these new point and the integration points. |
precalc.data |
List containing precalculated data. This list is generated using the function |
F.newdata |
The value of the kriging trend basis function at point X.new. |
c.newdata |
The (unconditional) covariance between X.new and the design points. |
This function requires to use another function in order to generate the proper arguments.
The argument precalc.data
can be generated using precomputeUpdateData
.
The arguments F.newdata
and c.newdata
can be obtained using predict_nobias_km
.
Matrix of size p*q containing kriging covariances
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
Chevalier C., Ginsbourger D. (2014), Corrected Kriging update formulae for batch-sequential data assimilation, in Pardo-Iguzquiza, E., et al. (Eds.) Mathematics of Planet Earth, pp 119-122
precomputeUpdateData
, predict_nobias_km
#computeQuickKrigcov set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") #the integration.points are the points where we want to #compute predictions/covariances if a point new.x is added #to the DOE x.grid <- seq(0,1,length=20) integration.points <- expand.grid(x.grid,x.grid) integration.points <- as.matrix(integration.points) #precalculation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model=model, integration.points=integration.points) #now we can compute quickly kriging covariances #between these data and any other points. #example if 5 new points are added: X.new <- matrix(runif(10),ncol=2) pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model, newdata=X.new,type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) kn <- computeQuickKrigcov(model=model, integration.points=integration.points,X.new=X.new, precalc.data=precalc.data, F.newdata=pred$F.newdata, c.newdata=pred$c)
#computeQuickKrigcov set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") #the integration.points are the points where we want to #compute predictions/covariances if a point new.x is added #to the DOE x.grid <- seq(0,1,length=20) integration.points <- expand.grid(x.grid,x.grid) integration.points <- as.matrix(integration.points) #precalculation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model=model, integration.points=integration.points) #now we can compute quickly kriging covariances #between these data and any other points. #example if 5 new points are added: X.new <- matrix(runif(10),ncol=2) pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model, newdata=X.new,type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) kn <- computeQuickKrigcov(model=model, integration.points=integration.points,X.new=X.new, precalc.data=precalc.data, F.newdata=pred$F.newdata, c.newdata=pred$c)
This function computes a constant used to calculate exactly the value of the "jn"
criterion.
Computing this constant does NOT change the optimum of the "jn"
criterion.
Therefore, its calculation is indicative only and is only necessary to know exactly (in expectation) the excursion set's volume variance.
computeRealVolumeConstant(model,integration.points, integration.weights=NULL,T)
computeRealVolumeConstant(model,integration.points, integration.weights=NULL,T)
model |
A Kriging model of |
integration.points |
p*d matrix of points for numerical integration in the X space. |
integration.weights |
(Optional) Vector of size p corresponding to the weights of these integration points. If not provided, all weights are set to 1. |
T |
Target threshold. |
Note that, even if the "jn"
criterion can be used with more than one threshold, the computation of this constant is implemented only
when the number of threshold is equal to 1.
a scalar
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
precomputeUpdateData
, predict_nobias_km
#computeRealVolumeConstant set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations testfun <- branin T <- 80 #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") integcontrol <- list(n.points=500,distrib="jn",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights ## Not run: computeRealVolumeConstant(model=model, integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights,T=T) ## End(Not run)
#computeRealVolumeConstant set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations testfun <- branin T <- 80 #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") integcontrol <- list(n.points=500,distrib="jn",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights ## Not run: computeRealVolumeConstant(model=model, integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights,T=T) ## End(Not run)
Sequential sampling based on the optimization of a kriging-based criterion, with model update after each iteration. The criterias aim at identifying an excursion set or one/many level sets. At each iteration batchsize = 1 new locations are evaluated.
Different criteria are available for selecting experiments. The pointwise criteria are "bichon"
, "ranjan"
, "tmse"
, "tsee"
and are fast to compute. In addition, integral criteria require numerical integration and can potentially deliver more than one new location per iteration. Available integral criteria are "imse"
, "timse"
, "sur"
, "jn"
, "vorob"
, "vorobCons"
, "vorobVol"
. The use of the integral criteria is implemented in the EGIparallel
function.
EGI(T, model, method = NULL, method.param = NULL, fun, iter, lower, upper, new.noise.var = 0, optimcontrol = NULL, kmcontrol = NULL, integcontrol = NULL, ...)
EGI(T, model, method = NULL, method.param = NULL, fun, iter, lower, upper, new.noise.var = 0, optimcontrol = NULL, kmcontrol = NULL, integcontrol = NULL, ...)
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. The criteria which can be used with multiple thresholds are |
model |
A Kriging model of |
method |
Criterion used for choosing observations. |
method.param |
Optional method parameters. For methods
|
fun |
Objective function. |
iter |
Number of iterations (i.e. number of additional sampling points). |
lower |
Vector containing the lower bounds of the design space. |
upper |
Vector containing the upper bounds of the design space. |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar value of the noise variance of the new observations. |
optimcontrol |
Optional list of control parameters for the optimization of the sampling criterion. The field |
kmcontrol |
Optional list representing the control variables for the re-estimation of the kriging model once new points are sampled.
The items are the same as in |
integcontrol |
Optional list specifying the procedure to build the integration points and weights, relevant only for the sampling criteria based on numerical integration: |
... |
Other arguments of the target function |
The function used to build the integration points and weights (based on the options specified in integcontrol
) is the function integration_design
A list with components:
par |
The added observations (ite * d matrix) |
value |
The value of the function |
nsteps |
The number of added observations (=ite). |
lastmodel |
The current (last) kriging model of |
lastvalue |
The value of the criterion at the last added point. |
allvalues |
If an optimization on a discrete set of points is chosen, the value of the criterion at all these points, for the last iteration. |
If method="vorobCons"
or method="vorobVol"
the list also has components:
current.CE |
Conservative estimate computed on |
allCE_lvs |
The conservative estimate levels computed at each iteration. |
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Victor Picheny (INRA, Toulouse, France)
David Ginsbourger (IDIAP Martigny and University of Bern, Switzerland)
Dario Azzimonti (IDSIA, Switzerland)
Azzimonti, D., Ginsbourger, D., Chevalier, C., Bect, J., and Richet, Y. (2018). Adaptive design of experiments for conservative estimation of excursion sets. Under revision. Preprint at hal-01379642
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
Picheny V., Ginsbourger D., Roustant O., Haftka R.T., (2010) Adaptive designs of experiments for accurate approximation of a target region, J. Mech. Des. vol. 132(7)
Chevalier C. (2013) Fast uncertainty reduction strategies relying on Gaussian process models Ph.D Thesis, University of Bern
Bichon B.J., Eldred M.S., Swiler L.P., Mahadevan S., McFarland J.M. (2008) Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions, AIAA Journal 46(10), pp 2459-2468
Ranjan P., Bingham D., Michailidis G. (2008) Sequential experiment design for contour estimation from complex computer codes Technometrics 50(4), pp 527-541
EGIparallel
,max_infill_criterion
#EGI set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=50) integcontrol <- list(distrib="sur",n.points=50) iter <- 1 ## Not run: obj1 <- EGI(T=T,model=model,method="sur",fun=testfun,iter=iter, lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, integcontrol=integcontrol) obj2 <- EGI(T=T,model=model,method="ranjan",fun=testfun,iter=iter, lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol) par(mfrow=c(1,3)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj1$lastmodel,T=T, main="updated probability of excursion, sur sampling", type="pn",new.points=iter,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj2$lastmodel,T=T, main="updated probability of excursion, ranjan sampling", type="pn",new.points=iter,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2) ## End(Not run) ############## #same example with noisy initial observations and noisy new observations branin.noise <- function(x) return(branin(x)+rnorm(n=1,sd=30)) set.seed(9) N <- 20;T <- 80 testfun <- branin.noise lower <- c(0,0);upper <- c(1,1) design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response.noise <- apply(design,1,testfun) response.noise - response model.noise <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response.noise, covtype="matern3_2",noise.var=rep(30*30,times=N)) optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=50) integcontrol <- list(distrib="sur",n.points=50) iter <- 1 ## Not run: obj1 <- EGI(T=T,model=model.noise,method="sur",fun=testfun,iter=iter, lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, integcontrol=integcontrol,new.noise.var=30*30) obj2 <- EGI(T=T,model=model.noise,method="ranjan",fun=testfun,iter=iter, lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, new.noise.var=30*30) par(mfrow=c(1,3)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model.noise,T=T, main="probability of excursion, noisy obs.", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj1$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, sur sampling, noisy obs.", type="pn",new.points=iter,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj2$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, ranjan sampling, noisy obs.", type="pn",new.points=iter,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2) ## End(Not run) ############## # Conservative estimates with non-noisy initial observations ## Not run: testfun <- branin ## Minimize Type II error sampling # The list method.param contains all parameters for the # conservative estimate and the conservative sequential # strategy. Below are parameters for a type II strategy # with conservative estimates at 0.95 method.param = list(penalization=0, # Type II strategy typeEx=">", consLevel = 0.95, n_discrete_design=500*model@d) # If the CE for the initial model is already computed # it is possible to pass the conservative Vorob'ev quantile # level with method.param$consVorbLevel obj_T2 <- EGI(T=T,model=model,method="vorobCons", fun=testfun,iter=iter,lower=lower,upper=upper, optimcontrol=optimcontrol, integcontrol=integcontrol,method.param=method.param) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_T2$allCE_lvs[1]) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj_T2$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, parallel Type II sampling", type="pn",new.points=iter,col.points.end="red", cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_T2$allCE_lvs[2]) ## Maximize conservative estimate's volume # Set up method.param # Here we pass the conservative level computed # in the previous step for the initial model method.param = list(typeEx=">", consLevel = 0.95, n_discrete_design=500*model@d, consVorbLevel=obj_T2$allCE_lvs[1] ) obj_consVol <- EGI(T=T,model=model,method="vorobVol", fun=testfun,iter=iter,lower=lower,upper=upper, optimcontrol=optimcontrol, integcontrol=integcontrol,method.param=method.param) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_consVol$allCE_lvs[1]) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj_consVol$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, parallel consVol sampling", type="pn",new.points=iter,col.points.end="red", cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_consVol$allCE_lvs[2]) ## End(Not run)
#EGI set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=50) integcontrol <- list(distrib="sur",n.points=50) iter <- 1 ## Not run: obj1 <- EGI(T=T,model=model,method="sur",fun=testfun,iter=iter, lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, integcontrol=integcontrol) obj2 <- EGI(T=T,model=model,method="ranjan",fun=testfun,iter=iter, lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol) par(mfrow=c(1,3)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj1$lastmodel,T=T, main="updated probability of excursion, sur sampling", type="pn",new.points=iter,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj2$lastmodel,T=T, main="updated probability of excursion, ranjan sampling", type="pn",new.points=iter,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2) ## End(Not run) ############## #same example with noisy initial observations and noisy new observations branin.noise <- function(x) return(branin(x)+rnorm(n=1,sd=30)) set.seed(9) N <- 20;T <- 80 testfun <- branin.noise lower <- c(0,0);upper <- c(1,1) design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response.noise <- apply(design,1,testfun) response.noise - response model.noise <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response.noise, covtype="matern3_2",noise.var=rep(30*30,times=N)) optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=50) integcontrol <- list(distrib="sur",n.points=50) iter <- 1 ## Not run: obj1 <- EGI(T=T,model=model.noise,method="sur",fun=testfun,iter=iter, lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, integcontrol=integcontrol,new.noise.var=30*30) obj2 <- EGI(T=T,model=model.noise,method="ranjan",fun=testfun,iter=iter, lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, new.noise.var=30*30) par(mfrow=c(1,3)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model.noise,T=T, main="probability of excursion, noisy obs.", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj1$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, sur sampling, noisy obs.", type="pn",new.points=iter,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj2$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, ranjan sampling, noisy obs.", type="pn",new.points=iter,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2) ## End(Not run) ############## # Conservative estimates with non-noisy initial observations ## Not run: testfun <- branin ## Minimize Type II error sampling # The list method.param contains all parameters for the # conservative estimate and the conservative sequential # strategy. Below are parameters for a type II strategy # with conservative estimates at 0.95 method.param = list(penalization=0, # Type II strategy typeEx=">", consLevel = 0.95, n_discrete_design=500*model@d) # If the CE for the initial model is already computed # it is possible to pass the conservative Vorob'ev quantile # level with method.param$consVorbLevel obj_T2 <- EGI(T=T,model=model,method="vorobCons", fun=testfun,iter=iter,lower=lower,upper=upper, optimcontrol=optimcontrol, integcontrol=integcontrol,method.param=method.param) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_T2$allCE_lvs[1]) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj_T2$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, parallel Type II sampling", type="pn",new.points=iter,col.points.end="red", cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_T2$allCE_lvs[2]) ## Maximize conservative estimate's volume # Set up method.param # Here we pass the conservative level computed # in the previous step for the initial model method.param = list(typeEx=">", consLevel = 0.95, n_discrete_design=500*model@d, consVorbLevel=obj_T2$allCE_lvs[1] ) obj_consVol <- EGI(T=T,model=model,method="vorobVol", fun=testfun,iter=iter,lower=lower,upper=upper, optimcontrol=optimcontrol, integcontrol=integcontrol,method.param=method.param) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_consVol$allCE_lvs[1]) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj_consVol$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, parallel consVol sampling", type="pn",new.points=iter,col.points.end="red", cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_consVol$allCE_lvs[2]) ## End(Not run)
Sequential sampling based on the optimization of a kriging-based criterion, with model update after each iteration. The criterias aim at identifying an excursion set or one/many level sets. At each iteration batchsize new locations are evaluated.
Different criteria are available for selecting experiments. The pointwise criteria are "bichon"
, "ranjan"
, "tmse"
, "tsee"
and are fast to compute. These criteria can be used only with batchsize = 1. In addition, integral criteria require numerical integration and can potentially deliver more than one new location per iteration. Available integral criteria are "imse"
, "timse"
, "sur"
, "jn"
, "vorob"
, "vorobCons"
, "vorobVol"
.
EGIparallel(T, model, method = NULL, method.param=NULL, fun, iter, batchsize = 1, lower, upper, new.noise.var = 0, optimcontrol = NULL, kmcontrol = NULL, integcontrol = NULL, ...)
EGIparallel(T, model, method = NULL, method.param=NULL, fun, iter, batchsize = 1, lower, upper, new.noise.var = 0, optimcontrol = NULL, kmcontrol = NULL, integcontrol = NULL, ...)
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. The criteria which can be used with multiple thresholds are |
model |
A Kriging model of |
method |
Criterion used for choosing observations. |
method.param |
Optional method parameters. For methods
|
batchsize |
Number of points to sample simultaneously. The sampling criterion will return |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar value of the noise variance of the new observations. |
fun |
Objective function. |
iter |
Number of iterations. |
lower |
Vector containing the lower bounds of the variables to be optimized over. |
upper |
Vector containing the upper bounds of the variables to be optimized over. |
optimcontrol |
Optional list of control parameters for the optimization of the sampling criterion. The field |
kmcontrol |
Optional list representing the control variables for the re-estimation of the kriging model once new points are sampled.
The items are the same as in |
integcontrol |
Optional list specifying the procedure to build the integration points and weights. Many options are possible.
A) If nothing is specified, 100*d points are chosen using the Sobol sequence. |
... |
Other arguments of the target function |
The function used to build the integration points and weights (based on the options specified in integcontrol
) is the function integration_design
A list with components:
par |
The added observations ((iter*batchsize) * d matrix) |
value |
The value of |
nsteps |
The number of added observations (=iter*batchsize). |
lastmodel |
The current (last) kriging model of |
lastvalue |
The value of the criterion at the last added batch of points. |
allvalues |
If an optimization on a discrete set of points is chosen, the value of the criterion at all these points, for the last iteration, for the last point of the batch. |
If method="vorobCons"
or method="vorobVol"
the list also has components:
current.CE |
Conservative estimate computed on |
allCE_lvs |
The conservative estimate levels computed at each iteration. |
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Victor Picheny (INRA, Toulouse, France)
David Ginsbourger (IDIAP Martigny and University of Bern, Switzerland)
Dario Azzimonti (IDSIA, Switzerland)
Azzimonti, D., Ginsbourger, D., Chevalier, C., Bect, J., and Richet, Y. (2018). Adaptive design of experiments for conservative estimation of excursion sets. Under revision. Preprint at hal-01379642
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
Picheny V., Ginsbourger D., Roustant O., Haftka R.T., (2010) Adaptive designs of experiments for accurate approximation of a target region, J. Mech. Des. vol. 132(7)
Chevalier C. (2013) Fast uncertainty reduction strategies relying on Gaussian process models Ph.D Thesis, University of Bern
#EGIparallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(20,60) #thresholds testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=50) integcontrol <- list(distrib="sur",n.points=50) iter <- 1 batchsize <- 6 ## Not run: obj <- EGIparallel(T=T,model=model,method="sur",batchsize=batchsize, fun=testfun,iter=iter,lower=lower,upper=upper, optimcontrol=optimcontrol,integcontrol=integcontrol) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, parallel sur sampling", type="pn",new.points=iter*batchsize,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2) ## End(Not run) ############## #same example with noisy initial observations and noisy new observations branin.noise <- function(x) return(branin(x)+rnorm(n=1,sd=30)) set.seed(9) N <- 20;T <- c(20,60) testfun <- branin.noise lower <- c(0,0);upper <- c(1,1) design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response.noise <- apply(design,1,testfun) response.noise - response model.noise <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response.noise, covtype="matern3_2",noise.var=rep(30*30,times=N)) optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=50) integcontrol <- list(distrib="sur",n.points=50) iter <- 1 batchsize <- 6 ## Not run: obj <- EGIparallel(T=T,model=model.noise,method="sur",batchsize=batchsize, fun=testfun,iter=iter,lower=lower,upper=upper, optimcontrol=optimcontrol,integcontrol=integcontrol, new.noise.var=10*10) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model.noise,T=T, main="probability of excursion, noisy obs.", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, parallel sur sampling, noisy obs.", type="pn",new.points=iter*batchsize,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2) ## End(Not run) ############## # Conservative estimates with non-noisy initial observations ## Not run: testfun <- branin # The conservative sampling strategies # only work with 1 threshold T <- 20 ## Minimize Type II error sampling # The list method.param contains all parameters for the # conservative estimate and the conservative sequential # strategy. Below are parameters for a type II strategy # with conservative estimates at 0.95 method.param = list(penalization=0, # Type II strategy typeEx=">", consLevel = 0.95, n_discrete_design=500*model@d) # If the CE for the initial model is already computed # it is possible to pass the conservative Vorob'ev quantile # level with method.param$consVorbLevel obj_T2 <- EGIparallel(T=T,model=model,method="vorobCons",batchsize=batchsize, fun=testfun,iter=iter,lower=lower,upper=upper, optimcontrol=optimcontrol, integcontrol=integcontrol,method.param=method.param) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_T2$allCE_lvs[1]) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj_T2$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, parallel Type II sampling", type="pn",new.points=iter*batchsize,col.points.end="red", cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_T2$allCE_lvs[2]) ## Maximize conservative estimate's volume # Set up method.param # Here we pass the conservative level computed # in the previous step for the initial model method.param = list(typeEx=">", consLevel = 0.95, n_discrete_design=500*model@d, consVorbLevel=obj_T2$allCE_lvs[1] ) obj_consVol <- EGIparallel(T=T,model=model,method="vorobVol",batchsize=batchsize, fun=testfun,iter=iter,lower=lower,upper=upper, optimcontrol=optimcontrol, integcontrol=integcontrol,method.param=method.param) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_consVol$allCE_lvs[1]) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj_consVol$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, parallel consVol sampling", type="pn",new.points=iter*batchsize,col.points.end="red", cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_consVol$allCE_lvs[2]) ## End(Not run)
#EGIparallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(20,60) #thresholds testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=50) integcontrol <- list(distrib="sur",n.points=50) iter <- 1 batchsize <- 6 ## Not run: obj <- EGIparallel(T=T,model=model,method="sur",batchsize=batchsize, fun=testfun,iter=iter,lower=lower,upper=upper, optimcontrol=optimcontrol,integcontrol=integcontrol) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, parallel sur sampling", type="pn",new.points=iter*batchsize,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2) ## End(Not run) ############## #same example with noisy initial observations and noisy new observations branin.noise <- function(x) return(branin(x)+rnorm(n=1,sd=30)) set.seed(9) N <- 20;T <- c(20,60) testfun <- branin.noise lower <- c(0,0);upper <- c(1,1) design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response.noise <- apply(design,1,testfun) response.noise - response model.noise <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response.noise, covtype="matern3_2",noise.var=rep(30*30,times=N)) optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=50) integcontrol <- list(distrib="sur",n.points=50) iter <- 1 batchsize <- 6 ## Not run: obj <- EGIparallel(T=T,model=model.noise,method="sur",batchsize=batchsize, fun=testfun,iter=iter,lower=lower,upper=upper, optimcontrol=optimcontrol,integcontrol=integcontrol, new.noise.var=10*10) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model.noise,T=T, main="probability of excursion, noisy obs.", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, parallel sur sampling, noisy obs.", type="pn",new.points=iter*batchsize,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2) ## End(Not run) ############## # Conservative estimates with non-noisy initial observations ## Not run: testfun <- branin # The conservative sampling strategies # only work with 1 threshold T <- 20 ## Minimize Type II error sampling # The list method.param contains all parameters for the # conservative estimate and the conservative sequential # strategy. Below are parameters for a type II strategy # with conservative estimates at 0.95 method.param = list(penalization=0, # Type II strategy typeEx=">", consLevel = 0.95, n_discrete_design=500*model@d) # If the CE for the initial model is already computed # it is possible to pass the conservative Vorob'ev quantile # level with method.param$consVorbLevel obj_T2 <- EGIparallel(T=T,model=model,method="vorobCons",batchsize=batchsize, fun=testfun,iter=iter,lower=lower,upper=upper, optimcontrol=optimcontrol, integcontrol=integcontrol,method.param=method.param) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_T2$allCE_lvs[1]) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj_T2$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, parallel Type II sampling", type="pn",new.points=iter*batchsize,col.points.end="red", cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_T2$allCE_lvs[2]) ## Maximize conservative estimate's volume # Set up method.param # Here we pass the conservative level computed # in the previous step for the initial model method.param = list(typeEx=">", consLevel = 0.95, n_discrete_design=500*model@d, consVorbLevel=obj_T2$allCE_lvs[1] ) obj_consVol <- EGIparallel(T=T,model=model,method="vorobVol",batchsize=batchsize, fun=testfun,iter=iter,lower=lower,upper=upper, optimcontrol=optimcontrol, integcontrol=integcontrol,method.param=method.param) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", type="pn",new.points=0,cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_consVol$allCE_lvs[1]) print_uncertainty_2d(model=obj_consVol$lastmodel,T=T, main="probability of excursion, parallel consVol sampling", type="pn",new.points=iter*batchsize,col.points.end="red", cex.points=2,consQuantile = obj_consVol$allCE_lvs[2]) ## End(Not run)
Probability that Gaussian random variables with some mean and variance are over a threshold T
, or in an union of intervals.
If T
is a vector of size p, T1,T2,...,Tp then the considered union of interval is (T1,T2) U ... U (Tp, +infty) if p is odd, and (T1,T2) U ... U (Tp-1, Tp) if p is even.
excursion_probability(mn,sn,T)
excursion_probability(mn,sn,T)
mn |
Array of size k containing the expectations of the Gaussian random variables. |
sn |
Array of size k containing the standard deviations of the Gaussian random variables. |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. |
Array of size k containing the k excursion probabilities.
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
#excursion_probability set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") some_points <- matrix(runif(20),ncol=2) pred <- predict_nobias_km(object = model,newdata = some_points, type = "UK",se.compute = TRUE) T <- c(60,80,100) excursion_probability(mn = pred$mean,sn = pred$sd,T=T) # probability to be in the interval [60,80] U [100, infty]
#excursion_probability set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") some_points <- matrix(runif(20),ncol=2) pred <- predict_nobias_km(object = model,newdata = some_points, type = "UK",se.compute = TRUE) T <- c(60,80,100) excursion_probability(mn = pred$mean,sn = pred$sd,T=T) # probability to be in the interval [60,80] U [100, infty]
Generic function to build integration points for some sampling criterion.
Available important sampling schemes are "sur"
, "jn"
, "timse"
, "vorob"
and "imse"
.
Each of them corresponds to a sampling criterion.
integration_design(integcontrol = NULL, d = NULL, lower, upper, model = NULL, T = NULL,min.prob=0.001)
integration_design(integcontrol = NULL, d = NULL, lower, upper, model = NULL, T = NULL,min.prob=0.001)
integcontrol |
Optional list specifying the procedure to build the integration points and weights, relevant only for the sampling criteria based on numerical integration:
( |
d |
The dimension of the input set. If not provided d is set equal to the length of |
lower |
Vector containing the lower bounds of the design space. |
upper |
Vector containing the upper bounds of the design space. |
model |
A Kriging model of |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. |
min.prob |
This argument applies only when importance sampling distributions are chosen. For numerical reasons we give a minimum probability for a point to belong to the importance sample. This avoids potential importance sampling weights equal to infinity. In an importance sample of M points, the maximum weight becomes |
The important sampling aims at improving the accuracy of the computation of criteria which involve numerical integration, like "timse"
, "sur"
, etc.
A list with components:
integration.points |
p * d matrix of p points used for the numerical calculation of integrals |
integration.weights |
Vector of size p corresponding to the weights of each points. If all the points are equally weighted, |
alpha |
If the |
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
Chevalier C. (2013) Fast uncertainty reduction strategies relying on Gaussian process models Ph.D Thesis, University of Bern
max_timse_parallel
, max_sur_parallel
#integration_design #when nothing is specified: integration points #are chosen with the sobol sequence integ.param <- integration_design(lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1)) plot(integ.param$integration.points) #an example with pure random integration points integcontrol <- list(distrib="MC",n.points=50) integ.param <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1)) plot(integ.param$integration.points) #an example with important sampling distributions #these distributions are used to compute integral criterion like #"sur","timse" or "imse" #for these, we need a kriging model set.seed(9) N <- 16;testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0);upper <- c(1,1) design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") integcontrol <- list(distrib="sur",n.points=200,n.candidates=5000, init.distrib="MC") T <- c(60,100) #we are interested in the set of points where the response is in [60,100] integ.param <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1), model=model,T=T) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,type="sur", col.points.init="red",cex.points=2, main="sur uncertainty and one sample of integration points") points(integ.param$integration.points,pch=17,cex=1)
#integration_design #when nothing is specified: integration points #are chosen with the sobol sequence integ.param <- integration_design(lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1)) plot(integ.param$integration.points) #an example with pure random integration points integcontrol <- list(distrib="MC",n.points=50) integ.param <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1)) plot(integ.param$integration.points) #an example with important sampling distributions #these distributions are used to compute integral criterion like #"sur","timse" or "imse" #for these, we need a kriging model set.seed(9) N <- 16;testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0);upper <- c(1,1) design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") integcontrol <- list(distrib="sur",n.points=200,n.candidates=5000, init.distrib="MC") T <- c(60,100) #we are interested in the set of points where the response is in [60,100] integ.param <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1), model=model,T=T) print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,type="sur", col.points.init="red",cex.points=2, main="sur uncertainty and one sample of integration points") points(integ.param$integration.points,pch=17,cex=1)
Evaluation of the parallel jn criterion for some candidate points. To be used in optimization routines, like in max_sur_parallel
.
To avoid numerical instabilities, the new points are evaluated only if they are not too close to an existing observation, or if there is some observation noise.
The criterion is the integral of the posterior expected "jn"
uncertainty, which is the posterior expected variance of the excursion set's volume.
jn_optim_parallel(x, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, current.sur, ai_precalc)
jn_optim_parallel(x, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, current.sur, ai_precalc)
x |
Vector of size batchsize*d at which one wants to evaluate the criterion. This argument is NOT a matrix. |
integration.points |
Matrix of points for numerical integration. Two cases are handled. If the |
integration.weights |
Vector of size p corresponding to the weights of these integration points. |
intpoints.oldmean |
Vector of size p, or 2p, corresponding to the kriging mean at the integration points before adding the batchsize points |
intpoints.oldsd |
Vector of size p, or 2p, corresponding to the kriging standard deviation at the integration points before adding the batchsize points |
precalc.data |
List containing useful data to compute quickly the updated kriging variance. This list can be generated using the |
model |
Object of class |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar value of the noise variance for the new observations. |
batchsize |
Number of points to sample simultaneously. The sampling criterion will return batchsize points at a time for sampling. |
current.sur |
Current value of the sur criterion (before adding new observations). |
ai_precalc |
This is a matrix with ith row equal to |
The first argument x
has been chosen to be a vector of size batchsize*d (and not a matrix with batchsize rows and d columns) so that an optimizer like genoud can optimize it easily.
For example if d=2, batchsize=3 and x=c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6)
, we will evaluate the parallel criterion at the three points (0.1,0.2),(0.3,0.4) and (0.5,0.6).
Parallel jn value
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
Chevalier C., Ginsbourger D. (2014), Corrected Kriging update formulae for batch-sequential data assimilation, in Pardo-Iguzquiza, E., et al. (Eds.) Mathematics of Planet Earth, pp 119-122
#jn_optim_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(80,100) #thresholds testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points n.points <- 200 integcontrol <- list(n.points=n.points,distrib="jn",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points # (2n.points)*d matrix integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights #vector of size n.points pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) nT <- 2 # number of thresholds ai_precalc <- matrix(rep(intpoints.oldmean,times=nT), nrow=nT,ncol=length(intpoints.oldmean),byrow=TRUE) ai_precalc <- ai_precalc - T # substracts Ti to the ith row of ai_precalc batchsize <- 4 x <- c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8) #one evaluation of the sur_optim_parallel criterion #we calculate the expectation of the future "sur" uncertainty #when 4 points are added to the doe #the 4 points are (0.1,0.2) , (0.3,0.4), (0.5,0.6), (0.7,0.8) jn_optim_parallel(x=x,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,current.sur=0,ai_precalc=ai_precalc) # the criterion takes a negative value, which is normal. # See the Technometrics paper in the references #the function max_sur_parallel will help to find the optimum: #ie: the batch of 4 minimizing the expectation of the future uncertainty
#jn_optim_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(80,100) #thresholds testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points n.points <- 200 integcontrol <- list(n.points=n.points,distrib="jn",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points # (2n.points)*d matrix integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights #vector of size n.points pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) nT <- 2 # number of thresholds ai_precalc <- matrix(rep(intpoints.oldmean,times=nT), nrow=nT,ncol=length(intpoints.oldmean),byrow=TRUE) ai_precalc <- ai_precalc - T # substracts Ti to the ith row of ai_precalc batchsize <- 4 x <- c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8) #one evaluation of the sur_optim_parallel criterion #we calculate the expectation of the future "sur" uncertainty #when 4 points are added to the doe #the 4 points are (0.1,0.2) , (0.3,0.4), (0.5,0.6), (0.7,0.8) jn_optim_parallel(x=x,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,current.sur=0,ai_precalc=ai_precalc) # the criterion takes a negative value, which is normal. # See the Technometrics paper in the references #the function max_sur_parallel will help to find the optimum: #ie: the batch of 4 minimizing the expectation of the future uncertainty
Evaluation of the parallel jn criterion for some candidate points, assuming that some other points are also going to be evaluated.
To be used in optimization routines, like in max_sur_parallel
.
To avoid numerical instabilities, the new points are evaluated only if they are not too close to an existing observation, or if there is some observation noise.
The criterion is the integral of the posterior expected "jn"
uncertainty, which is the posterior expected variance of the excursion set's volume.
jn_optim_parallel2(x, other.points, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, current.sur,ai_precalc)
jn_optim_parallel2(x, other.points, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, current.sur,ai_precalc)
x |
Input vector of size d at which one wants to evaluate the criterion. This argument corresponds to only ONE point. |
other.points |
Vector giving the other |
integration.points |
Matrix of points for numerical integration. Two cases are handled. If the |
integration.weights |
Vector of size p corresponding to the weights of these integration points. |
intpoints.oldmean |
Vector of size p, or 2p, corresponding to the kriging mean at the integration points before adding |
intpoints.oldsd |
Vector of size p, or 2p, corresponding to the kriging standard deviation at the integration points before adding |
precalc.data |
List containing useful data to compute quickly the updated kriging variance. This list can be generated using the |
model |
Object of class |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar value of the noise variance of the new observations. |
batchsize |
Number of points to sample simultaneously. The sampling criterion will return batchsize points at a time for sampling. |
current.sur |
Current value of the sur criterion (before adding new observations) |
ai_precalc |
When multiple thresholds are used (i.e. when T is a vector), this is an nT*p matrix with ith row equal to |
The first argument x
has been chosen to be a vector of size d so that an optimizer like genoud can optimize it easily.
The second argument other.points
is a vector of size (batchsize-1)*d corresponding to the batchsize-1 other points.
Parallel jn value
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
Chevalier C., Ginsbourger D. (2014), Corrected Kriging update formulae for batch-sequential data assimilation, in Pardo-Iguzquiza, E., et al. (Eds.) Mathematics of Planet Earth, pp 119-122
#jn_optim_parallel2 set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(80,100) #threshold or thresholds testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=200,distrib="jn",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1), model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) nT <- 2 # number of thresholds ai_precalc <- matrix(rep(intpoints.oldmean,times=nT), nrow=nT,ncol=length(intpoints.oldmean),byrow=TRUE) ai_precalc <- ai_precalc - T # substracts Ti to the ith row of ai_precalc batchsize <- 4 other.points <- c(0.7,0.5,0.5,0.9,0.9,0.8) x <- c(0.1,0.2) #one evaluation of the jn_optim_parallel criterion2 #we calculate the expectation of the future "sur" uncertainty when #1+3 points are added to the doe #the 1+3 points are (0.1,0.2) and (0.7,0.5), (0.5,0.9), (0.9,0.8) jn_optim_parallel2(x=x,other.points,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,current.sur=Inf,ai_precalc=ai_precalc) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) jn_parallel.grid <- apply(X=x,FUN=jn_optim_parallel2,MARGIN=1,other.points, integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,current.sur=Inf,ai_precalc=ai_precalc) z.grid <- matrix(jn_parallel.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, doe points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) points(matrix(other.points,ncol=2,byrow=TRUE), col="red", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.min(jn_parallel.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of jn_parallel criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
#jn_optim_parallel2 set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(80,100) #threshold or thresholds testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=200,distrib="jn",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1), model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) nT <- 2 # number of thresholds ai_precalc <- matrix(rep(intpoints.oldmean,times=nT), nrow=nT,ncol=length(intpoints.oldmean),byrow=TRUE) ai_precalc <- ai_precalc - T # substracts Ti to the ith row of ai_precalc batchsize <- 4 other.points <- c(0.7,0.5,0.5,0.9,0.9,0.8) x <- c(0.1,0.2) #one evaluation of the jn_optim_parallel criterion2 #we calculate the expectation of the future "sur" uncertainty when #1+3 points are added to the doe #the 1+3 points are (0.1,0.2) and (0.7,0.5), (0.5,0.9), (0.9,0.8) jn_optim_parallel2(x=x,other.points,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,current.sur=Inf,ai_precalc=ai_precalc) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) jn_parallel.grid <- apply(X=x,FUN=jn_optim_parallel2,MARGIN=1,other.points, integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,current.sur=Inf,ai_precalc=ai_precalc) z.grid <- matrix(jn_parallel.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, doe points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) points(matrix(other.points,ncol=2,byrow=TRUE), col="red", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.min(jn_parallel.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of jn_parallel criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
Maximizes the criterion vorobVol_optim_parallel
.
max_futureVol_parallel(lower, upper, optimcontrol = NULL, batchsize, integration.param, T, model, new.noise.var = 0, typeEx = ">")
max_futureVol_parallel(lower, upper, optimcontrol = NULL, batchsize, integration.param, T, model, new.noise.var = 0, typeEx = ">")
lower |
lower bounds of the domain |
upper |
upper bounds of the domain |
optimcontrol |
optional list of control parameters for optimization aspects, see |
batchsize |
size of the batch of new points |
integration.param |
Optional list of control parameter for the computation of integrals, containing the fields |
T |
threshold |
model |
a km Model |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar with the noise variance at the new observation |
typeEx |
a character (">" or "<") identifying the type of excursion |
A list containing par
, the best set of parameters found, value
the value of the criterion and alpha
, the Vorob'ev quantile corresponding to the conservative estimate.
Dario Azzimonti (IDSIA, Switzerland)
Azzimonti, D. and Ginsbourger, D. (2018). Estimating orthant probabilities of high dimensional Gaussian vectors with an application to set estimation. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 27(2), 255-267.
Azzimonti, D. (2016). Contributions to Bayesian set estimation relying on random field priors. PhD thesis, University of Bern.
Azzimonti, D., Ginsbourger, D., Chevalier, C., Bect, J., and Richet, Y. (2018). Adaptive design of experiments for conservative estimation of excursion sets. Under revision. Preprint at hal-01379642
Chevalier, C., Bect, J., Ginsbourger, D., Vazquez, E., Picheny, V., and Richet, Y. (2014). Fast kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set. Technometrics, 56(4):455-465.
EGIparallel
,max_vorob_parallel
#max_futureVol_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=200,optim.option=2) integcontrol <- list(distrib="timse",n.points=400,init.distrib="MC") integration.param <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,d=2, lower=lower,upper=upper,model=model, T=T) batchsize <- 5 #number of new points ## Not run: obj <- max_futureVol_parallel(lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, batchsize=batchsize,T=T,model=model, integration.param=integration.param) #5 optims in dimension 2 ! obj$par;obj$value #optimum in 5 new points new.model <- update(object=model,newX=obj$par,newy=apply(obj$par,1,testfun), cov.reestim=TRUE) consLevel = 0.95; n_discrete_design=500*new.model@d CE_design=as.matrix (randtoolbox::sobol (n = n_discrete_design, dim = new.model@d)) colnames(CE_design) <- colnames(new.model@X) current.pred = predict.km(object = new.model, newdata = CE_design, type = "UK",cov.compute = TRUE) current.pred$cov <- current.pred$cov +1e-7*diag(nrow = nrow(current.pred$cov), ncol = ncol(current.pred$cov)) current.CE = anMC::conservativeEstimate(alpha = consLevel, pred=current.pred, design=CE_design, threshold=T, pn = NULL, type = ">", verb = 1, lightReturn = TRUE, algo = "GANMC") par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, cex.points=2.5,main="probability of excursion",consQuantile=obj$alpha) print_uncertainty(model=new.model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, new.points=batchsize,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2.5, main="updated probability of excursion",consQuantile=current.CE$lvs) ## End(Not run)
#max_futureVol_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=200,optim.option=2) integcontrol <- list(distrib="timse",n.points=400,init.distrib="MC") integration.param <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,d=2, lower=lower,upper=upper,model=model, T=T) batchsize <- 5 #number of new points ## Not run: obj <- max_futureVol_parallel(lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, batchsize=batchsize,T=T,model=model, integration.param=integration.param) #5 optims in dimension 2 ! obj$par;obj$value #optimum in 5 new points new.model <- update(object=model,newX=obj$par,newy=apply(obj$par,1,testfun), cov.reestim=TRUE) consLevel = 0.95; n_discrete_design=500*new.model@d CE_design=as.matrix (randtoolbox::sobol (n = n_discrete_design, dim = new.model@d)) colnames(CE_design) <- colnames(new.model@X) current.pred = predict.km(object = new.model, newdata = CE_design, type = "UK",cov.compute = TRUE) current.pred$cov <- current.pred$cov +1e-7*diag(nrow = nrow(current.pred$cov), ncol = ncol(current.pred$cov)) current.CE = anMC::conservativeEstimate(alpha = consLevel, pred=current.pred, design=CE_design, threshold=T, pn = NULL, type = ">", verb = 1, lightReturn = TRUE, algo = "GANMC") par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, cex.points=2.5,main="probability of excursion",consQuantile=obj$alpha) print_uncertainty(model=new.model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, new.points=batchsize,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2.5, main="updated probability of excursion",consQuantile=current.CE$lvs) ## End(Not run)
Optimization, of the chosen infill criterion (maximization or minimization, depending on the case)
max_infill_criterion(lower, upper, optimcontrol = NULL, method, T, model, method.param = NULL)
max_infill_criterion(lower, upper, optimcontrol = NULL, method, T, model, method.param = NULL)
lower |
Vector containing the lower bounds of the design space. |
upper |
Vector containing the upper bounds of the design space. |
optimcontrol |
Optional list of control parameters for the optimization of the sampling criterion. The field |
method |
Criterion used for choosing observations: |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. The |
model |
A Kriging model of |
method.param |
Optional tolerance value (scalar). Default value is 1 for |
A list with components:
par |
The best set of parameters found. |
value |
The value of the chosen criterion at par. |
allvalues |
If an optimization on a discrete set of points is chosen, the value of the criterion at all these points. |
Victor Picheny (INRA, Toulouse, France)
David Ginsbourger (IDIAP Martigny and University of Bern, Switzerland)
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Li L., Picheny V., Vazquez E. (2012), Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure, Statistics and Computing vol. 22(3), pp 773-793
Picheny V., Ginsbourger D., Roustant O., Haftka R.T., (2010) Adaptive designs of experiments for accurate approximation of a target region, J. Mech. Des. vol. 132(7)
Bichon B.J., Eldred M.S., Swiler L.P., Mahadevan S., McFarland J.M. (2008) Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions, AIAA Journal 46(10), pp 2459-2468
Ranjan P., Bingham D., Michailidis G. (2008) Sequential experiment design for contour estimation from complex computer codes Technometrics 50(4), pp 527-541
EGI
,ranjan_optim
,tmse_optim
,bichon_optim
,tsee_optim
#max_infill_criterion set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=50) ## Not run: obj <- max_infill_criterion(lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, method="bichon",T=T,model=model) obj$par;obj$value new.model <- update(object=model,newX=obj$par,newy=testfun(obj$par),cov.reestim=TRUE) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, cex.points=2.5,main="probability of excursion") print_uncertainty(model=new.model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, new.points=1,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2.5,main="updated probability of excursion") ## End(Not run)
#max_infill_criterion set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=50) ## Not run: obj <- max_infill_criterion(lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, method="bichon",T=T,model=model) obj$par;obj$value new.model <- update(object=model,newX=obj$par,newy=testfun(obj$par),cov.reestim=TRUE) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, cex.points=2.5,main="probability of excursion") print_uncertainty(model=new.model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, new.points=1,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2.5,main="updated probability of excursion") ## End(Not run)
"sur"
or "jn"
criterionMinimization, based on the package rgenoud (or on exhaustive search on a discrete set), of the "sur"
or "jn"
criterion for a batch of candidate sampling points.
max_sur_parallel(lower, upper, optimcontrol = NULL, batchsize, integration.param, T, model, new.noise.var = 0,real.volume.variance=FALSE)
max_sur_parallel(lower, upper, optimcontrol = NULL, batchsize, integration.param, T, model, new.noise.var = 0,real.volume.variance=FALSE)
lower |
Vector containing the lower bounds of the design space. |
upper |
Vector containing the upper bounds of the design space. |
optimcontrol |
Optional list of control parameters for the optimization of the sampling criterion. The field |
batchsize |
Number of points to sample simultaneously. The sampling criterion will return batchsize points at a time for sampling. |
integration.param |
Optional list of control parameter for the computation of integrals, containing the fields |
T |
Target value (scalar). |
model |
A Kriging model of |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar value of the noise variance of the new observations. |
real.volume.variance |
Optional argument to use the |
A list with components:
par |
the best set of points found. |
value |
the value of the sur criterion at par. |
allvalues |
If an optimization on a discrete set of points is chosen, the value of the criterion at all these points. |
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
Chevalier C., Ginsbourger D. (2014), Corrected Kriging update formulae for batch-sequential data assimilation, in Pardo-Iguzquiza, E., et al. (Eds.) Mathematics of Planet Earth, pp 119-122
EGIparallel
,sur_optim_parallel
,jn_optim_parallel
#max_sur_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(40,80) #thresholds testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=50,optim.option=1) integcontrol <- list(distrib="sur",n.points=50,init.distrib="MC") integration.param <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,d=2, lower=lower,upper=upper,model=model, T=T) batchsize <- 5 #number of new points ## Not run: obj <- max_sur_parallel(lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, batchsize=batchsize,T=T,model=model, integration.param=integration.param) #one (hard) optim in dimension 5*2 ! obj$par;obj$value #optimum in 5 new points new.model <- update(object=model,newX=obj$par,newy=apply(obj$par,1,testfun), cov.reestim=TRUE) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, cex.points=2.5,main="probability of excursion") print_uncertainty(model=new.model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, new.points=batchsize,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2.5, main="updated probability of excursion") ## End(Not run)
#max_sur_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(40,80) #thresholds testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=50,optim.option=1) integcontrol <- list(distrib="sur",n.points=50,init.distrib="MC") integration.param <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,d=2, lower=lower,upper=upper,model=model, T=T) batchsize <- 5 #number of new points ## Not run: obj <- max_sur_parallel(lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, batchsize=batchsize,T=T,model=model, integration.param=integration.param) #one (hard) optim in dimension 5*2 ! obj$par;obj$value #optimum in 5 new points new.model <- update(object=model,newX=obj$par,newy=apply(obj$par,1,testfun), cov.reestim=TRUE) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, cex.points=2.5,main="probability of excursion") print_uncertainty(model=new.model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, new.points=batchsize,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2.5, main="updated probability of excursion") ## End(Not run)
Minimization, based on the package rgenoud (or on exhaustive search on a discrete set), of the timse criterion for a batch of candidate sampling points.
max_timse_parallel(lower, upper, optimcontrol = NULL, batchsize, integration.param, T, model, new.noise.var = 0, epsilon=0,imse=FALSE)
max_timse_parallel(lower, upper, optimcontrol = NULL, batchsize, integration.param, T, model, new.noise.var = 0, epsilon=0,imse=FALSE)
lower |
Vector containing the lower bounds of the design space. |
upper |
Vector containing the upper bounds of the design space. |
optimcontrol |
Optional list of control parameters for the optimization of the sampling criterion. The field |
batchsize |
Number of points to sample simultaneously. The sampling criterion will return batchsize points at a time for sampling. |
integration.param |
Optional list of control parameter for the computation of integrals, containing the fields |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. |
model |
A Kriging model of |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar value of the noise variance of the new observations. |
epsilon |
Optional tolerance value (a real positive number). Default value is 0. |
imse |
Optional boolean to decide if the |
A list with components:
par |
the best set of parameters found. |
value |
the value of the sur criterion at par. |
allvalues |
If an optimization on a discrete set of points is chosen, the value of the criterion at all these points. |
Victor Picheny (INRA, Toulouse, France)
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Picheny V., Ginsbourger D., Roustant O., Haftka R.T., (2010) Adaptive designs of experiments for accurate approximation of a target region, J. Mech. Des. vol. 132(7)
Picheny V. (2009) Improving accuracy and compensating for uncertainty in surrogate modeling, Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida and Ecole Nationale Superieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
#max_timse_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(40,80) #thresholds testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=200,optim.option=2) integcontrol <- list(distrib="timse",n.points=400,init.distrib="MC") integration.param <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,d=2, lower=lower,upper=upper,model=model, T=T) batchsize <- 5 #number of new points ## Not run: obj <- max_timse_parallel(lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, batchsize=batchsize,T=T,model=model, integration.param=integration.param,epsilon=0,imse=FALSE) #5 optims in dimension 2 ! obj$par;obj$value #optimum in 5 new points new.model <- update(object=model,newX=obj$par,newy=apply(obj$par,1,testfun), cov.reestim=TRUE) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, cex.points=2.5,main="probability of excursion") print_uncertainty(model=new.model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, new.points=batchsize,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2.5, main="updated probability of excursion") ## End(Not run)
#max_timse_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(40,80) #thresholds testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=200,optim.option=2) integcontrol <- list(distrib="timse",n.points=400,init.distrib="MC") integration.param <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,d=2, lower=lower,upper=upper,model=model, T=T) batchsize <- 5 #number of new points ## Not run: obj <- max_timse_parallel(lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, batchsize=batchsize,T=T,model=model, integration.param=integration.param,epsilon=0,imse=FALSE) #5 optims in dimension 2 ! obj$par;obj$value #optimum in 5 new points new.model <- update(object=model,newX=obj$par,newy=apply(obj$par,1,testfun), cov.reestim=TRUE) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, cex.points=2.5,main="probability of excursion") print_uncertainty(model=new.model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper, new.points=batchsize,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2.5, main="updated probability of excursion") ## End(Not run)
Minimization, based on the package rgenoud (or on exhaustive search on a discrete set), of the Vorob'ev criterion for a batch of candidate sampling points.
max_vorob_parallel(lower, upper, optimcontrol = NULL, batchsize, integration.param, T, model, new.noise.var = 0, penalisation = NULL, typeEx = ">")
max_vorob_parallel(lower, upper, optimcontrol = NULL, batchsize, integration.param, T, model, new.noise.var = 0, penalisation = NULL, typeEx = ">")
lower |
Vector containing the lower bounds of the design space. |
upper |
Vector containing the upper bounds of the design space. |
optimcontrol |
Optional list of control parameters for the optimization of the sampling criterion. The field |
batchsize |
Number of points to sample simultaneously. The sampling criterion will return batchsize points at a time for sampling. |
integration.param |
Optional list of control parameter for the computation of integrals, containing the fields |
T |
Target value (scalar). The criterion CANNOT be used with multiple thresholds. |
model |
A Kriging model of |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar value of the noise variance of the new observations. |
penalisation |
Optional penalization constant for type I errors. If equal to zero, computes the Type II criterion. |
typeEx |
A character (">" or "<") identifying the type of excursion |
A list with components:
par |
the best set of parameters found. |
value |
the value of the Vorob'ev criterion at par. |
allvalues |
If an optimization on a discrete set of points is chosen, the value of the criterion at all these points. |
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Dario Azzimonti (IDSIA, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Ginsbouger D., Bect J., Molchanov I. (2013) Estimating and quantifying uncertainties on level sets using the Vorob'ev expectation and deviation with gaussian process models mODa 10, Advances in Model-Oriented Design and Analysis, Contributions to Statistics, pp 35-43
Chevalier C. (2013) Fast uncertainty reduction strategies relying on Gaussian process models Ph.D Thesis, University of Bern
Azzimonti, D., Ginsbourger, D., Chevalier, C., Bect, J., and Richet, Y. (2018). Adaptive design of experiments for conservative estimation of excursion sets. Under revision. Preprint at hal-01379642
#max_vorob_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=200,optim.option=2) integcontrol <- list(distrib="timse",n.points=400,init.distrib="MC") integration.param <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,d=2, lower=lower,upper=upper,model=model, T=T) batchsize <- 5 #number of new points ## Not run: obj <- max_vorob_parallel(lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, batchsize=batchsize,T=T,model=model, integration.param=integration.param) #5 optims in dimension 2 ! obj$par;obj$value #optimum in 5 new points new.model <- update(object=model,newX=obj$par,newy=apply(obj$par,1,testfun), cov.reestim=TRUE) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper,vorobmean=TRUE, cex.points=2.5,main="probability of excursion") print_uncertainty(model=new.model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper,vorobmean=TRUE, new.points=batchsize,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2.5, main="updated probability of excursion") ## End(Not run)
#max_vorob_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") optimcontrol <- list(method="genoud",pop.size=200,optim.option=2) integcontrol <- list(distrib="timse",n.points=400,init.distrib="MC") integration.param <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,d=2, lower=lower,upper=upper,model=model, T=T) batchsize <- 5 #number of new points ## Not run: obj <- max_vorob_parallel(lower=lower,upper=upper,optimcontrol=optimcontrol, batchsize=batchsize,T=T,model=model, integration.param=integration.param) #5 optims in dimension 2 ! obj$par;obj$value #optimum in 5 new points new.model <- update(object=model,newX=obj$par,newy=apply(obj$par,1,testfun), cov.reestim=TRUE) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper,vorobmean=TRUE, cex.points=2.5,main="probability of excursion") print_uncertainty(model=new.model,T=T,type="pn",lower=lower,upper=upper,vorobmean=TRUE, new.points=batchsize,col.points.end="red",cex.points=2.5, main="updated probability of excursion") ## End(Not run)
This function is used in combination with computeQuickKrigcov
and computes an output list that serves as input in that function.
precomputeUpdateData(model, integration.points)
precomputeUpdateData(model, integration.points)
model |
A Kriging model of |
integration.points |
p*d matrix of points for numerical integration in the X space. |
A list with components:
Kinv.c.olddata |
Matrix equal to K^(-1)*c where K is the non conditional covariance matrix at the design points and c is the non conditional covariances between the design points and the integration points. |
Kinv.F |
Matrix equal to K^(-1)*F where F is a matrix with the values of the trend functions at the design points. |
first.member |
Matrix with a complicated expression. |
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
Chevalier C., Ginsbourger D. (2014), Corrected Kriging update formulae for batch-sequential data assimilation, in Pardo-Iguzquiza, E., et al. (Eds.) Mathematics of Planet Earth, pp 119-122
#precomputeUpdateData set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") #the points where we want to compute prediction (if a point new.x is added to the doe) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) integration.points <- expand.grid(x.grid,y.grid) integration.points <- as.matrix(integration.points) precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model=model,integration.points=integration.points) #now we can compute quickly kriging covariances #between the integration.points and any other points newdata <- matrix(c(0.6,0.6),ncol=2) pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=newdata,type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) kn <- computeQuickKrigcov(model=model,integration.points=integration.points,X.new=newdata, precalc.data=precalc.data,F.newdata=pred$F.newdata, c.newdata=pred$c) z.grid <- matrix(kn, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the covariances, DOE points and new point #these covariances have been computed quickly with computeQuickKrigcov image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) points(newdata, col="red", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) title("Kriging covariances with the point (0.6,0.6), in red")
#precomputeUpdateData set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") #the points where we want to compute prediction (if a point new.x is added to the doe) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) integration.points <- expand.grid(x.grid,y.grid) integration.points <- as.matrix(integration.points) precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model=model,integration.points=integration.points) #now we can compute quickly kriging covariances #between the integration.points and any other points newdata <- matrix(c(0.6,0.6),ncol=2) pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=newdata,type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) kn <- computeQuickKrigcov(model=model,integration.points=integration.points,X.new=newdata, precalc.data=precalc.data,F.newdata=pred$F.newdata, c.newdata=pred$c) z.grid <- matrix(kn, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the covariances, DOE points and new point #these covariances have been computed quickly with computeQuickKrigcov image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) points(newdata, col="red", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) title("Kriging covariances with the point (0.6,0.6), in red")
This function is similar to the predict.km function from the DiceKriging package. The only change is the additionnal F.newdata output.
predict_nobias_km(object, newdata, type = "UK", se.compute = TRUE, cov.compute = FALSE, low.memory=FALSE,...)
predict_nobias_km(object, newdata, type = "UK", se.compute = TRUE, cov.compute = FALSE, low.memory=FALSE,...)
object |
A Kriging model of |
newdata |
Vector, matrix or data frame containing the points where to perform predictions. |
type |
Character string corresponding to the kriging family, to be chosen between simple kriging ("SK"), or universal kriging ("UK"). |
se.compute |
Optional boolean. If |
cov.compute |
Optional boolean. If |
low.memory |
Optional boolean. If set to |
... |
No other arguments. |
mean |
kriging mean (including the trend) computed at |
sd |
kriging standard deviation computed at |
cov |
kriging conditional covariance matrix. Not computed if |
lower95 |
|
upper95 |
bounds of the 95 % confidence interval computed at |
c |
an auxiliary matrix, containing all the covariances between newdata and the initial design points. |
Tinv.c |
an auxiliary vector, equal to |
F.newdata |
value of the trend function at |
Beware that the only consistency check between newdata
and the experimental design is to test whether they have same number of columns. In that case, the columns of newdata
are interpreted in the same order as the initial design.
O. Roustant (Ecole des Mines de St-Etienne, France)
David Ginsbourger (IDIAP Martigny and University of Bern, Switzerland)
N.A.C. Cressie (1993), Statistics for spatial data, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.
A.G. Journel and C.J. Huijbregts (1978), Mining Geostatistics, Academic Press, London.
D.G. Krige (1951), A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the witwatersrand, J. of the Chem., Metal. and Mining Soc. of South Africa, 52 no. 6, 119-139.
J.D. Martin and T.W. Simpson (2005), Use of kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models, AIAA Journal, 43 no. 4, 853-863.
G. Matheron (1963), Principles of geostatistics, Economic Geology, 58, 1246-1266.
G. Matheron (1969), Le krigeage universel, Les Cahiers du Centre de Morphologie Mathematique de Fontainebleau, 1.
J.-S. Park and J. Baek (2001), Efficient computation of maximum likelihood estimators in a spatial linear model with power exponential covariogram, Computer Geosciences, 27 no. 1, 1-7.
C.E. Rasmussen and C.K.I. Williams (2006), Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, the MIT Press, https://gaussianprocess.org/gpml/
J. Sacks, W.J. Welch, T.J. Mitchell, and H.P. Wynn (1989), Design and analysis of computer experiments, Statistical Science, 4, 409-435.
#predict_nobias_km set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") n.grid <- 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) newdata <- expand.grid(x.grid,y.grid) pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=newdata,type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) z.grid1 <- matrix(pred$mean, n.grid, n.grid) z.grid2 <- matrix(pred$sd, n.grid, n.grid) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) #plots: contour of the kriging mean and stdev image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid1,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid1,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) title("Kriging mean") image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid2,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid2,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) title("Kriging standard deviation")
#predict_nobias_km set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") n.grid <- 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) newdata <- expand.grid(x.grid,y.grid) pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=newdata,type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) z.grid1 <- matrix(pred$mean, n.grid, n.grid) z.grid2 <- matrix(pred$sd, n.grid, n.grid) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) #plots: contour of the kriging mean and stdev image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid1,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid1,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) title("Kriging mean") image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid2,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid2,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) title("Kriging standard deviation")
The functions uses the kriging update formulas to quickly compute kriging mean and variances at points newdata, when r
new points newX
are added.
predict_update_km_parallel(newXmean, newXvar, newXvalue, Sigma.r, newdata.oldmean, newdata.oldsd, kn)
predict_update_km_parallel(newXmean, newXvar, newXvalue, Sigma.r, newdata.oldmean, newdata.oldsd, kn)
newXmean |
Vector of size r: old kriging mean at points x_(n+1),...,x_(n+r). |
newXvar |
Vector of size r: kriging variance at points x_(n+1),...,x_(n+r). |
newXvalue |
Vector of size r: value of the objective function at x_(n+1),...,x_(n+r). |
Sigma.r |
An r*r matrix: kriging covariances between the points x_(n+1),...,x_(n+r). |
newdata.oldmean |
Vector: old kriging mean at the points |
newdata.oldsd |
Vector: old kriging standard deviations at the points |
kn |
Kriging covariances between the points |
A list with the following fields:
mean |
Updated kriging mean at points |
sd |
Updated kriging standard deviation at points |
lambda |
New kriging weight of x_(n+1),...,x_(n+r) for the prediction at points |
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Ginsbourger D. (2014), Corrected Kriging update formulae for batch-sequential data assimilation, in Pardo-Iguzquiza, E., et al. (Eds.) Mathematics of Planet Earth, pp 119-122
computeQuickKrigcov
, precomputeUpdateData
#predict_update_km_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") #points where we want to compute prediction (if a point new.x is added to the doe) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) newdata <- expand.grid(x.grid,y.grid) newdata <- as.matrix(newdata) precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model=model,integration.points=newdata) pred2 <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=newdata,type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) newdata.oldmean <- pred2$mean; newdata.oldsd <- pred2$sd #the point that we are going to add new.x <- matrix(c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8),ncol=2,byrow=TRUE) pred1 <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=new.x,type="UK", se.compute=TRUE,cov.compute=TRUE) newXmean <- pred1$mean; newXvar <- pred1$sd^2; newXvalue <- pred1$mean + 2*pred1$sd Sigma.r <- pred1$cov kn <- computeQuickKrigcov(model=model,integration.points=newdata,X.new=new.x, precalc.data=precalc.data,F.newdata=pred1$F.newdata, c.newdata=pred1$c) updated.predictions <- predict_update_km_parallel(newXmean=newXmean,newXvar=newXvar, newXvalue=newXvalue,Sigma.r=Sigma.r, newdata.oldmean=newdata.oldmean, newdata.oldsd=newdata.oldsd,kn=kn) #the new kriging variance is usually lower than the old one updated.predictions$sd - newdata.oldsd z.grid1 <- matrix(newdata.oldsd, n.grid, n.grid) z.grid2 <- matrix(updated.predictions$sd, n.grid, n.grid) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid1,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid1,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) title("Kriging standard deviation") image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid2,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid2,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) points(new.x, col="red", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) title("updated Kriging standard deviation")
#predict_update_km_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") #points where we want to compute prediction (if a point new.x is added to the doe) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) newdata <- expand.grid(x.grid,y.grid) newdata <- as.matrix(newdata) precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model=model,integration.points=newdata) pred2 <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=newdata,type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) newdata.oldmean <- pred2$mean; newdata.oldsd <- pred2$sd #the point that we are going to add new.x <- matrix(c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8),ncol=2,byrow=TRUE) pred1 <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=new.x,type="UK", se.compute=TRUE,cov.compute=TRUE) newXmean <- pred1$mean; newXvar <- pred1$sd^2; newXvalue <- pred1$mean + 2*pred1$sd Sigma.r <- pred1$cov kn <- computeQuickKrigcov(model=model,integration.points=newdata,X.new=new.x, precalc.data=precalc.data,F.newdata=pred1$F.newdata, c.newdata=pred1$c) updated.predictions <- predict_update_km_parallel(newXmean=newXmean,newXvar=newXvar, newXvalue=newXvalue,Sigma.r=Sigma.r, newdata.oldmean=newdata.oldmean, newdata.oldsd=newdata.oldsd,kn=kn) #the new kriging variance is usually lower than the old one updated.predictions$sd - newdata.oldsd z.grid1 <- matrix(newdata.oldsd, n.grid, n.grid) z.grid2 <- matrix(updated.predictions$sd, n.grid, n.grid) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid1,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid1,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) title("Kriging standard deviation") image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid2,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid2,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) points(new.x, col="red", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) title("updated Kriging standard deviation")
This function prints the value of a given measure of uncertainty.
The function can be used to print relevant outputs after having used the function EGI
or EGIparallel
.
print_uncertainty(model, T, type = "pn", ...)
print_uncertainty(model, T, type = "pn", ...)
model |
Kriging model of |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. |
type |
Type of uncertainty that the user wants to print.
Possible values are |
... |
Other arguments of the functions |
the integrated uncertainty
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Li L., Picheny V., Vazquez E. (2012), Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure, Statistics and Computing vol. 22(3), pp 773-793
print_uncertainty_1d
,print_uncertainty_2d
,print_uncertainty_nd
#print_uncertainty set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(80,100) #threshold testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") #you could do many plots, but only one is run here print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion",type="pn") #print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,main="Vorob'ev uncertainty",type="vorob") #print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,main="imse uncertainty",type="imse") #print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,main="timse uncertainty",type="timse") #print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,main="sur uncertainty",type="sur") #print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion",type="pn", #vorobmean=TRUE)
#print_uncertainty set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(80,100) #threshold testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") #you could do many plots, but only one is run here print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion",type="pn") #print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,main="Vorob'ev uncertainty",type="vorob") #print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,main="imse uncertainty",type="imse") #print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,main="timse uncertainty",type="timse") #print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,main="sur uncertainty",type="sur") #print_uncertainty(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion",type="pn", #vorobmean=TRUE)
This function draws the value of a given measure of uncertainty over the whole input domain (1D).
The function can be used to print relevant outputs after having used the function EGI
or EGIparallel
.
print_uncertainty_1d(model, T, type = "pn", lower = 0, upper = 1, resolution = 500, new.points = 0, xscale = c(0, 1), show.points = TRUE, cex.points = 1, cex.axis = 1, pch.points.init = 17, pch.points.end = 17, col.points.init = "black", col.points.end = "red", xaxislab = NULL, yaxislab = NULL, xaxispoint = NULL, yaxispoint = NULL, vorobmean=FALSE,krigmeanplot=FALSE,Tplot=FALSE,consQuantile=NULL,...)
print_uncertainty_1d(model, T, type = "pn", lower = 0, upper = 1, resolution = 500, new.points = 0, xscale = c(0, 1), show.points = TRUE, cex.points = 1, cex.axis = 1, pch.points.init = 17, pch.points.end = 17, col.points.init = "black", col.points.end = "red", xaxislab = NULL, yaxislab = NULL, xaxispoint = NULL, yaxispoint = NULL, vorobmean=FALSE,krigmeanplot=FALSE,Tplot=FALSE,consQuantile=NULL,...)
model |
Kriging model of |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. |
type |
Type of uncertainty that the user wants to print.
Possible values are |
lower |
Lower bound for the input domain. |
upper |
Upper bound for the input domain. |
resolution |
Number of points to discretize the interval (lower,upper). |
new.points |
Number of new observations.
These observations are the last new.points observations and can be printed in another color and the initial observations (see argument: |
xscale |
If one wants to rescale the input domain on another interval it is possible to set this vector of size 2. The new interval will be translated by |
show.points |
Boolean: should we show the observations on the graph ? |
cex.points |
Multiplicative factor for the size of the points. |
cex.axis |
Multiplicative factor for the size of the axis graduations. |
pch.points.init |
Symbol for the |
pch.points.end |
Symbol for the |
col.points.init |
Color for the |
col.points.end |
Color for the |
xaxislab |
Optional new labels that will replace the normal levels on x axis. |
yaxislab |
Optional new labels that will replace the normal levels on y axis. |
xaxispoint |
Position of these new labels on x axis. |
yaxispoint |
Position of these new labels on y axis. |
vorobmean |
Optional boolean. When it is set to |
krigmeanplot |
When set to |
Tplot |
When set to |
consQuantile |
Optional value for plotting conservative quantiles. In order to plot
|
... |
Additional arguments to the |
The integrated uncertainty. If the conservative estimate is computed, it also returns the conservative quantile level.
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Dario Azzimonti (IDSIA, Switzerland)
Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Li L., Picheny V., Vazquez E. (2012), Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure, Statistics and Computing vol. 22(3), pp 773-793
print_uncertainty_2d
,print_uncertainty_nd
#print_uncertainty_1d set.seed(9) N <- 9 #number of observations T <- c(-0.2,0.2) #thresholds testfun <- sin lower <- c(0) upper <- c(6) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( lower+(upper-lower)*matrix(runif(N),ncol=1) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") print_uncertainty_1d(model=model,T=T,lower=lower,upper=upper, main="probability of excursion",xlab="x",ylab="pn", cex.points=1.5,col.points.init="red", krigmeanplot=TRUE,Tplot=TRUE) ## Not run: uq1d <- print_uncertainty_1d(model=model,T=T,lower=lower,upper=upper, main="probability of excursion",xlab="x",ylab="pn", cex.points=1.5,col.points.init="red", krigmeanplot=TRUE,Tplot=TRUE,consQuantile =list(consLevel=0.95)) print_uncertainty_1d(model=model,T=T,lower=lower,upper=upper, main="probability of excursion",xlab="x",ylab="pn", cex.points=1.5,col.points.init="red", krigmeanplot=TRUE,Tplot=TRUE,consQuantile =uq1d[2]) ## End(Not run)
#print_uncertainty_1d set.seed(9) N <- 9 #number of observations T <- c(-0.2,0.2) #thresholds testfun <- sin lower <- c(0) upper <- c(6) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( lower+(upper-lower)*matrix(runif(N),ncol=1) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") print_uncertainty_1d(model=model,T=T,lower=lower,upper=upper, main="probability of excursion",xlab="x",ylab="pn", cex.points=1.5,col.points.init="red", krigmeanplot=TRUE,Tplot=TRUE) ## Not run: uq1d <- print_uncertainty_1d(model=model,T=T,lower=lower,upper=upper, main="probability of excursion",xlab="x",ylab="pn", cex.points=1.5,col.points.init="red", krigmeanplot=TRUE,Tplot=TRUE,consQuantile =list(consLevel=0.95)) print_uncertainty_1d(model=model,T=T,lower=lower,upper=upper, main="probability of excursion",xlab="x",ylab="pn", cex.points=1.5,col.points.init="red", krigmeanplot=TRUE,Tplot=TRUE,consQuantile =uq1d[2]) ## End(Not run)
This function draws the value of a given measure of uncertainty over the whole input domain (2D).
The function can be used to print relevant outputs after having used the function EGI
or EGIparallel
.
print_uncertainty_2d(model, T, type = "pn", lower = c(0, 0), upper = c(1, 1), resolution = 200, new.points = 0, xscale = c(0, 1), yscale = c(0, 1), show.points = TRUE, cex.contourlab = 1, cex.points = 1, cex.axis = 1, pch.points.init = 17, pch.points.end = 17, col.points.init = "black", col.points.end = "red", nlevels = 10, levels = NULL, xaxislab = NULL, yaxislab = NULL, xaxispoint = NULL, yaxispoint = NULL, krigmeanplot=FALSE,vorobmean=FALSE,consQuantile=NULL,...)
print_uncertainty_2d(model, T, type = "pn", lower = c(0, 0), upper = c(1, 1), resolution = 200, new.points = 0, xscale = c(0, 1), yscale = c(0, 1), show.points = TRUE, cex.contourlab = 1, cex.points = 1, cex.axis = 1, pch.points.init = 17, pch.points.end = 17, col.points.init = "black", col.points.end = "red", nlevels = 10, levels = NULL, xaxislab = NULL, yaxislab = NULL, xaxispoint = NULL, yaxispoint = NULL, krigmeanplot=FALSE,vorobmean=FALSE,consQuantile=NULL,...)
model |
Kriging model of |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. |
type |
Type of uncertainty that the user wants to print.
Possible values are |
lower |
Vector containing the lower bounds of the input domain. |
upper |
Vector containing the upper bounds of the input domain. |
resolution |
Number of points to discretize the domain. This discretization is used in each dimension, so that the total number of points is |
new.points |
Number of new observations.
These observations are the last new.points observations and can be printed in another color and the initial observations (see argument: |
xscale |
If one wants to rescale the input domain on another interval it is possible to set this vector of size 2. The new interval will be translated by |
yscale |
see: |
show.points |
Boolean: should we show the observations on the graph ? |
cex.contourlab |
Multiplicative factor for the size of labels of the contour plot. |
cex.points |
Multiplicative factor for the size of the points. |
cex.axis |
Multiplicative factor for the size of the axis graduations. |
pch.points.init |
Symbol for the |
pch.points.end |
Symbol for the |
col.points.init |
Color for the |
col.points.end |
Color for the |
nlevels |
Integer corresponding to the number of levels of the contour plot. |
levels |
Array: one can directly set the levels of the contour plot. |
xaxislab |
Optional new labels that will replace the normal levels on x axis. |
yaxislab |
Optional new labels that will replace the normal levels on y axis. |
xaxispoint |
Position of these new labels on x axis. |
yaxispoint |
Position of these new labels on y axis. |
krigmeanplot |
Optional boolean. When it is set to |
vorobmean |
Optional boolean. When it is set to |
consQuantile |
Optional value for plotting conservative quantiles. In order to plot
|
... |
Additional arguments to the |
The integrated uncertainty. If the conservative estimate is computed, it also returns the conservative quantile level.
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Dario Azzimonti (IDSIA, Switzerland)
Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Li L., Picheny V., Vazquez E. (2012), Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure, Statistics and Computing vol. 22(3), pp 773-793
print_uncertainty_1d
,print_uncertainty_nd
#print_uncertainty_2d set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(20,40) #thresholds testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ## Not run: print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", type="pn",krigmeanplot=TRUE,vorobmean=TRUE) #print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="vorob uncertainty", #type="vorob",krigmeanplot=FALSE) #print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="imse uncertainty", #type="imse",krigmeanplot=FALSE) #print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="timse uncertainty", #type="timse",krigmeanplot=FALSE) ## Print uncertainty 2d and conservative estimate at level 0.95 # uq2d<- print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", # type="pn",krigmeanplot=TRUE,vorobmean=FALSE, # consQuantile=list(consLevel=0.95)) # print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", # type="pn",krigmeanplot=TRUE,vorobmean=FALSE, # consQuantile=uq2d[2]) ## End(Not run)
#print_uncertainty_2d set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(20,40) #thresholds testfun <- branin lower <- c(0,0) upper <- c(1,1) #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ## Not run: print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", type="pn",krigmeanplot=TRUE,vorobmean=TRUE) #print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="vorob uncertainty", #type="vorob",krigmeanplot=FALSE) #print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="imse uncertainty", #type="imse",krigmeanplot=FALSE) #print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="timse uncertainty", #type="timse",krigmeanplot=FALSE) ## Print uncertainty 2d and conservative estimate at level 0.95 # uq2d<- print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", # type="pn",krigmeanplot=TRUE,vorobmean=FALSE, # consQuantile=list(consLevel=0.95)) # print_uncertainty_2d(model=model,T=T,main="probability of excursion", # type="pn",krigmeanplot=TRUE,vorobmean=FALSE, # consQuantile=uq2d[2]) ## End(Not run)
This function draws projections on various plans of a given measure of uncertainty.
The function can be used to print relevant outputs after having used the function EGI
or EGIparallel
.
print_uncertainty_nd(model,T,type="pn",lower=NULL,upper=NULL, resolution=20, nintegpoints=400, cex.lab=1,cex.contourlab=1,cex.axis=1, nlevels=10,levels=NULL, xdecal=3,ydecal=3, option="mean", pairs=NULL,...)
print_uncertainty_nd(model,T,type="pn",lower=NULL,upper=NULL, resolution=20, nintegpoints=400, cex.lab=1,cex.contourlab=1,cex.axis=1, nlevels=10,levels=NULL, xdecal=3,ydecal=3, option="mean", pairs=NULL,...)
model |
Kriging model of |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. |
type |
Type of uncertainty that the user wants to print.
Possible values are |
lower |
Vector containing the lower bounds of the input domain. If nothing is set we use a vector of 0. |
upper |
Vector containing the upper bounds of the input domain. If nothing is set we use a vector of 1. |
resolution |
Number of points to discretize a plan included in the domain. For the moment, we cannot use values higher than 40 do to
computation time, except when the argument |
nintegpoints |
to do |
cex.lab |
Multiplicative factor for the size of titles of the axis. |
cex.contourlab |
Multiplicative factor for the size of labels of the contour plot. |
cex.axis |
Multiplicative factor for the size of the axis graduations. |
nlevels |
Integer corresponding to the number of levels of the contour plot. |
levels |
Array: one can directly set the levels of the contour plot. |
xdecal |
Optional position shifting of the titles of the x axis. |
ydecal |
Optional position shifting of the titles of the y axis. |
option |
Optional argument (a string). The 3 possible values are |
pairs |
Optional argument. When set to codeNULL (default) the function performs the projections on plans spanned by each pair (i,j) of dimension. Otherwise, the argument is an array of size 2 corresponding to the dimensions spanning the (only) plan on which the projection is performed. |
... |
Additional arguments to the |
The integrated uncertainty
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Li L., Picheny V., Vazquez E. (2012), Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure, Statistics and Computing vol. 22(3), pp 773-793
print_uncertainty_1d
,print_uncertainty_2d
#print_uncertainty_nd set.seed(9) N <- 30 #number of observations T <- -1 #threshold testfun <- hartman3 #The hartman3 function is defined over the domain [0,1]^3. lower <- rep(0,times=3) upper <- rep(1,times=3) #a 30 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(3*N),ncol=3) ) response <- apply(design,1,testfun) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ## Not run: print_uncertainty_nd(model=model,T=T,main="average probability of excursion",type="pn", option="mean") print_uncertainty_nd(model=model,T=T,main="maximum probability of excursion",type="pn", option="max") ## End(Not run)
#print_uncertainty_nd set.seed(9) N <- 30 #number of observations T <- -1 #threshold testfun <- hartman3 #The hartman3 function is defined over the domain [0,1]^3. lower <- rep(0,times=3) upper <- rep(1,times=3) #a 30 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(3*N),ncol=3) ) response <- apply(design,1,testfun) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ## Not run: print_uncertainty_nd(model=model,T=T,main="average probability of excursion",type="pn", option="mean") print_uncertainty_nd(model=model,T=T,main="maximum probability of excursion",type="pn", option="max") ## End(Not run)
Evaluation of Ranjan's Expected Feasibility criterion. To be used in optimization routines, like in max_infill_criterion
.
ranjan_optim(x, model, T, method.param = 1)
ranjan_optim(x, model, T, method.param = 1)
x |
Input vector at which one wants to evaluate the criterion. This argument can be either a vector of size d (for an evaluation at a single point) or a p*d matrix (for p simultaneous evaluations of the criterion at p different points). |
model |
An object of class |
T |
Target value (scalar). |
method.param |
Scalar tolerance around the target T. Default value is 1. |
Ranjan EI criterion.
When the argument x
is a vector the function returns a scalar.
When the argument x
is a p*d matrix the function returns a vector of size p.
Victor Picheny (INRA, Toulouse, France)
David Ginsbourger (IDIAP Martigny and University of Bern, Switzerland)
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Ranjan, P., Bingham, D., Michailidis, G. (2008) Sequential experiment design for contour estimation from complex computer codes Technometrics 50(4), pp 527-541
Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Li L., Picheny V., Vazquez E. (2010), Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure, Statistics and Computing, pp.1-21, 2011, https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.5177
######################################################################## #ranjan_optim set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") x <- c(0.5,0.4)#one evaluation of the ranjan criterion ranjan_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) ranjan.grid <- ranjan_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) z.grid <- matrix(ranjan.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, DOE points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,25,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.max(ranjan.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of Ranjan criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
######################################################################## #ranjan_optim set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") x <- c(0.5,0.4)#one evaluation of the ranjan criterion ranjan_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) ranjan.grid <- ranjan_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) z.grid <- matrix(ranjan.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, DOE points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,25,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.max(ranjan.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of Ranjan criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
Evaluation of the parallel sur criterion for some candidate points. To be used in optimization routines, like in max_sur_parallel
.
To avoid numerical instabilities, the new points are evaluated only if they are not too close to an existing observation, or if there is some observation noise.
The criterion is the integral of the expected future sur uncertainty when the candidate points are added.
sur_optim_parallel(x, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, current.sur, ai_precalc = NULL)
sur_optim_parallel(x, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, current.sur, ai_precalc = NULL)
x |
Vector of size batchsize*d at which one wants to evaluate the criterion. This argument is NOT a matrix. |
integration.points |
p*d matrix of points for numerical integration in the X space. |
integration.weights |
Vector of size p corresponding to the weights of these integration points. |
intpoints.oldmean |
Vector of size p corresponding to the kriging mean at the integration points before adding the batchsize points |
intpoints.oldsd |
Vector of size p corresponding to the kriging standard deviation at the integration points before adding the batchsize points |
precalc.data |
List containing useful data to compute quickly the updated kriging variance. This list can be generated using the |
model |
Object of class |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar value of the noise variance for the new observations. |
batchsize |
Number of points to sample simultaneously. The sampling criterion will return batchsize points at a time for sampling. |
current.sur |
Current value of the sur criterion (before adding new observations) |
ai_precalc |
When multiple thresholds are used (i.e. when T is a vector), this is an nT*p matrix with ith row equal to |
The first argument x
has been chosen to be a vector of size batchsize*d (and not a matrix with batchsize rows and d columns) so that an optimizer like genoud can optimize it easily.
For example if d=2, batchsize=3 and x=c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6)
, we will evaluate the parallel criterion at the three points (0.1,0.2),(0.3,0.4) and (0.5,0.6).
Parallel sur value
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
Chevalier C., Ginsbourger D. (2014), Corrected Kriging update formulae for batch-sequential data assimilation, in Pardo-Iguzquiza, E., et al. (Eds.) Mathematics of Planet Earth, pp 119-122
#sur_optim_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(80,100) #thresholds testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=50,distrib="sur",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) nT <- 2 # number of thresholds ai_precalc <- matrix(rep(intpoints.oldmean,times=nT), nrow=nT,ncol=length(intpoints.oldmean),byrow=TRUE) ai_precalc <- ai_precalc - T # substracts Ti to the ith row of ai_precalc batchsize <- 4 x <- c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8) #one evaluation of the sur_optim_parallel criterion #we calculate the expectation of the future "sur" uncertainty #when 4 points are added to the doe #the 4 points are (0.1,0.2) , (0.3,0.4), (0.5,0.6), (0.7,0.8) sur_optim_parallel(x=x,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,current.sur=Inf,ai_precalc=ai_precalc) #the function max_sur_parallel will help to find the optimum: #ie: the batch of 4 minimizing the expectation of the future uncertainty
#sur_optim_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(80,100) #thresholds testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=50,distrib="sur",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) nT <- 2 # number of thresholds ai_precalc <- matrix(rep(intpoints.oldmean,times=nT), nrow=nT,ncol=length(intpoints.oldmean),byrow=TRUE) ai_precalc <- ai_precalc - T # substracts Ti to the ith row of ai_precalc batchsize <- 4 x <- c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8) #one evaluation of the sur_optim_parallel criterion #we calculate the expectation of the future "sur" uncertainty #when 4 points are added to the doe #the 4 points are (0.1,0.2) , (0.3,0.4), (0.5,0.6), (0.7,0.8) sur_optim_parallel(x=x,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,current.sur=Inf,ai_precalc=ai_precalc) #the function max_sur_parallel will help to find the optimum: #ie: the batch of 4 minimizing the expectation of the future uncertainty
Evaluation of the parallel sur criterion for some candidate points, assuming that some other points are also going to be evaluated.
To be used in optimization routines, like in max_sur_parallel
.
To avoid numerical instabilities, the new points are evaluated only if they are not too close to an existing observation, or if there is some observation noise.
The criterion is the integral of the expected future sur uncertainty when the candidate points are added.
sur_optim_parallel2(x, other.points, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, current.sur,ai_precalc = NULL)
sur_optim_parallel2(x, other.points, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, current.sur,ai_precalc = NULL)
x |
Input vector of size d at which one wants to evaluate the criterion. This argument corresponds to only ONE point. |
other.points |
Vector giving the other |
integration.points |
p*d matrix of points for numerical integration in the X space. |
integration.weights |
Vector of size p corresponding to the weights of these integration points. |
intpoints.oldmean |
Vector of size p corresponding to the kriging mean at the integration points before adding |
intpoints.oldsd |
Vector of size p corresponding to the kriging standard deviation at the integration points before adding |
precalc.data |
List containing useful data to compute quickly the updated kriging variance. This list can be generated using the |
model |
Object of class |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar value of the noise variance of the new observations. |
batchsize |
Number of points to sample simultaneously. The sampling criterion will return batchsize points at a time for sampling. |
current.sur |
Current value of the sur criterion (before adding new observations) |
ai_precalc |
When multiple thresholds are used (i.e. when T is a vector), this is an nT*p matrix with ith row equal to |
The first argument x
has been chosen to be a vector of size d so that an optimizer like genoud can optimize it easily.
The second argument other.points
is a vector of size (batchsize-1)*d corresponding to the batchsize-1 other points.
Parallel sur value
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
Chevalier C., Ginsbourger D. (2014), Corrected Kriging update formulae for batch-sequential data assimilation, in Pardo-Iguzquiza, E., et al. (Eds.) Mathematics of Planet Earth, pp 119-122
#sur_optim_parallel2 set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(80,100) #thresholds testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=50,distrib="sur",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1), model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) nT <- 2 # number of thresholds ai_precalc <- matrix(rep(intpoints.oldmean,times=nT), nrow=nT,ncol=length(intpoints.oldmean),byrow=TRUE) ai_precalc <- ai_precalc - T # substracts Ti to the ith row of ai_precalc batchsize <- 4 other.points <- c(0.7,0.5,0.5,0.9,0.9,0.8) x <- c(0.1,0.2) #one evaluation of the sur_optim_parallel criterion2 #we calculate the expectation of the future "sur" uncertainty when #1+3 points are added to the doe #the 1+3 points are (0.1,0.2) and (0.7,0.5), (0.5,0.9), (0.9,0.8) sur_optim_parallel2(x=x,other.points,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,current.sur=Inf,ai_precalc=ai_precalc) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) sur_parallel.grid <- apply(X=x,FUN=sur_optim_parallel2,MARGIN=1,other.points, integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,current.sur=Inf,ai_precalc=ai_precalc) z.grid <- matrix(sur_parallel.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, doe points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) points(matrix(other.points,ncol=2,byrow=TRUE), col="red", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.min(sur_parallel.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of sur_parallel criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
#sur_optim_parallel2 set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(80,100) #thresholds testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=50,distrib="sur",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1), model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) nT <- 2 # number of thresholds ai_precalc <- matrix(rep(intpoints.oldmean,times=nT), nrow=nT,ncol=length(intpoints.oldmean),byrow=TRUE) ai_precalc <- ai_precalc - T # substracts Ti to the ith row of ai_precalc batchsize <- 4 other.points <- c(0.7,0.5,0.5,0.9,0.9,0.8) x <- c(0.1,0.2) #one evaluation of the sur_optim_parallel criterion2 #we calculate the expectation of the future "sur" uncertainty when #1+3 points are added to the doe #the 1+3 points are (0.1,0.2) and (0.7,0.5), (0.5,0.9), (0.9,0.8) sur_optim_parallel2(x=x,other.points,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,current.sur=Inf,ai_precalc=ai_precalc) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) sur_parallel.grid <- apply(X=x,FUN=sur_optim_parallel2,MARGIN=1,other.points, integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,current.sur=Inf,ai_precalc=ai_precalc) z.grid <- matrix(sur_parallel.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, doe points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) points(matrix(other.points,ncol=2,byrow=TRUE), col="red", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.min(sur_parallel.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of sur_parallel criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
Evaluation of the "timse"
criterion for some candidate points. To be used in optimization routines, like in max_timse_parallel
.
To avoid numerical instabilities, the new points are evaluated only if they are not too close to an existing observation, or if there is some observation noise.
The criterion is the integral of the posterior timse uncertainty.
timse_optim_parallel(x, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean = NULL, intpoints.oldsd = NULL, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = 0, weight = NULL, batchsize, current.timse)
timse_optim_parallel(x, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean = NULL, intpoints.oldsd = NULL, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = 0, weight = NULL, batchsize, current.timse)
x |
Input vector of size d at which one wants to evaluate the criterion. |
integration.points |
p*d matrix of points for numerical integration in the X space. |
integration.weights |
Vector of size p corresponding to the weights of these integration points. |
intpoints.oldmean |
Vector of size p corresponding to the kriging mean at the integration points before adding |
intpoints.oldsd |
Vector of size p corresponding to the kriging standard deviation at the integration points before adding |
precalc.data |
List containing useful data to compute quickly the updated kriging variance. This list can be generated using the |
model |
Object of class |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar value of the noise variance of the new observations. |
weight |
Vector of weight function (length must be equal to the number of lines of the matrix integration.points). If nothing is set, the imse criterion is used instead of timse. It corresponds to equal weights. |
batchsize |
Number of points to sample simultaneously. The sampling criterion will return batchsize points at a time for sampling. |
current.timse |
Current value of the timse criterion (before adding new observations) |
Targeted imse value
Victor Picheny (INRA, Toulouse, France)
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Picheny V., Ginsbourger D., Roustant O., Haftka R.T., (2010) Adaptive designs of experiments for accurate approximation of a target region, J. Mech. Des. vol. 132(7)
Picheny V. (2009) Improving accuracy and compensating for uncertainty in surrogate modeling, Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida and Ecole Nationale Superieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
EGIparallel
, max_timse_parallel
#timse_optim_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(80,100) #thresholds testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=1000,distrib="timse",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,lower=c(0,0), upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) #we also need to compute weights. Otherwise the (more simple) #imse criterion will be evaluated weight0 <- 1/sqrt( 2*pi*(intpoints.oldsd^2) ) weight <- 0 for(i in 1:length(T)){ Ti <- T[i] weight <- weight + weight0 * exp(-0.5*((intpoints.oldmean-Ti)/sqrt(intpoints.oldsd^2))^2) } batchsize <- 4 x <- c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8) #one evaluation of the timse_optim_parallel criterion #we calculate the expectation of the future "timse" #uncertainty when 4 points are added to the doe #the 4 points are (0.1,0.2) , (0.3,0.4), (0.5,0.6), (0.7,0.8) timse_optim_parallel(x=x,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model,weight=weight, batchsize=batchsize,current.timse=Inf) #the function max_timse_parallel will help to find the optimum: #ie: the batch of 4 minimizing the expectation of the future uncertainty
#timse_optim_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(80,100) #thresholds testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=1000,distrib="timse",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,lower=c(0,0), upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) #we also need to compute weights. Otherwise the (more simple) #imse criterion will be evaluated weight0 <- 1/sqrt( 2*pi*(intpoints.oldsd^2) ) weight <- 0 for(i in 1:length(T)){ Ti <- T[i] weight <- weight + weight0 * exp(-0.5*((intpoints.oldmean-Ti)/sqrt(intpoints.oldsd^2))^2) } batchsize <- 4 x <- c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8) #one evaluation of the timse_optim_parallel criterion #we calculate the expectation of the future "timse" #uncertainty when 4 points are added to the doe #the 4 points are (0.1,0.2) , (0.3,0.4), (0.5,0.6), (0.7,0.8) timse_optim_parallel(x=x,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model,weight=weight, batchsize=batchsize,current.timse=Inf) #the function max_timse_parallel will help to find the optimum: #ie: the batch of 4 minimizing the expectation of the future uncertainty
Evaluation of the parallel timse criterion for some candidate points, assuming that some other points are also going to be evaluated.
To be used in optimization routines, like in max_timse_parallel
.
To avoid numerical instabilities, the new points are evaluated only if they are not too close to an existing observation, or if there is some observation noise.
The criterion is the integral of the posterior timse uncertainty.
timse_optim_parallel2(x, other.points, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL,weight = NULL, batchsize, current.timse)
timse_optim_parallel2(x, other.points, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL,weight = NULL, batchsize, current.timse)
x |
Input vector of size d at which one wants to evaluate the criterion. This argument corresponds to only ONE point. |
other.points |
Vector giving the other |
integration.points |
p*d matrix of points for numerical integration in the X space. |
integration.weights |
Vector of size p corresponding to the weights of these integration points. |
intpoints.oldmean |
Vector of size p corresponding to the kriging mean at the integration points before adding |
intpoints.oldsd |
Vector of size p corresponding to the kriging standard deviation at the integration points before adding |
precalc.data |
List containing useful data to compute quickly the updated kriging variance. This list can be generated using the |
model |
Object of class |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar value of the noise variance for the new observations. |
weight |
Vector of weight function (length must be equal to the number of lines of the matrix integration.points). If nothing is set, the imse criterion is used instead of timse. It corresponds to equal weights. |
batchsize |
Number of points to sample simultaneously. The sampling criterion will return batchsize points at a time for sampling. |
current.timse |
Current value of the timse criterion (before adding new observations) |
The first argument x
has been chosen to be a vector of size d so that an optimizer like genoud can optimize it easily.
The second argument other.points
is a vector of size (batchsize-1)*d corresponding to the batchsize-1 other points.
Parallel timse value
Victor Picheny (INRA, Toulouse, France)
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Picheny V., Ginsbourger D., Roustant O., Haftka R.T., (2010) Adaptive designs of experiments for accurate approximation of a target region, J. Mech. Des. vol. 132(7)
Picheny V. (2009) Improving accuracy and compensating for uncertainty in surrogate modeling, Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida and Ecole Nationale Superieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne
Chevalier C., Bect J., Ginsbourger D., Vazquez E., Picheny V., Richet Y. (2014), Fast parallel kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set, Technometrics, vol. 56(4), pp 455-465
EGIparallel
, max_timse_parallel
#timse_optim_parallel2 set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(80,100) #thresholds testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=1000,distrib="timse",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1), model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) #we also need to compute weights. Otherwise the (more simple) #imse criterion will be evaluated weight0 <- 1/sqrt( 2*pi*(intpoints.oldsd^2) ) weight <- 0 for(i in 1:length(T)){ Ti <- T[i] weight <- weight + weight0 * exp(-0.5*((intpoints.oldmean-Ti)/sqrt(intpoints.oldsd^2))^2) } batchsize <- 4 other.points <- c(0.7,0.5,0.5,0.9,0.9,0.8) x <- c(0.1,0.2) #one evaluation of the timse_optim_parallel criterion2 #we calculate the expectation of the future "timse" uncertainty #when 1+3 points are added to the doe #the 1+3 points are (0.1,0.2) and (0.7,0.5), (0.5,0.9), (0.9,0.8) timse_optim_parallel2(x=x,other.points,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model,weight=weight, batchsize=batchsize,current.timse=Inf) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) timse_parallel.grid <- apply(X=x,FUN=timse_optim_parallel2,MARGIN=1,other.points, integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model,weight=weight, batchsize=batchsize,current.timse=Inf) z.grid <- matrix(timse_parallel.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, doe points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) points(matrix(other.points,ncol=2,byrow=TRUE), col="red", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.min(timse_parallel.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of timse_parallel criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
#timse_optim_parallel2 set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(80,100) #thresholds testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=1000,distrib="timse",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol,lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1), model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) #we also need to compute weights. Otherwise the (more simple) #imse criterion will be evaluated weight0 <- 1/sqrt( 2*pi*(intpoints.oldsd^2) ) weight <- 0 for(i in 1:length(T)){ Ti <- T[i] weight <- weight + weight0 * exp(-0.5*((intpoints.oldmean-Ti)/sqrt(intpoints.oldsd^2))^2) } batchsize <- 4 other.points <- c(0.7,0.5,0.5,0.9,0.9,0.8) x <- c(0.1,0.2) #one evaluation of the timse_optim_parallel criterion2 #we calculate the expectation of the future "timse" uncertainty #when 1+3 points are added to the doe #the 1+3 points are (0.1,0.2) and (0.7,0.5), (0.5,0.9), (0.9,0.8) timse_optim_parallel2(x=x,other.points,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model,weight=weight, batchsize=batchsize,current.timse=Inf) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) timse_parallel.grid <- apply(X=x,FUN=timse_optim_parallel2,MARGIN=1,other.points, integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model,weight=weight, batchsize=batchsize,current.timse=Inf) z.grid <- matrix(timse_parallel.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, doe points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) points(matrix(other.points,ncol=2,byrow=TRUE), col="red", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.min(timse_parallel.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of timse_parallel criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
Evaluation of the Targeted MSE criterion. To be used in optimization routines,
like in max_infill_criterion
tmse_optim(x, model, T, method.param = NULL)
tmse_optim(x, model, T, method.param = NULL)
x |
Input vector at which one wants to evaluate the criterion. This argument can be either a vector of size d (for an evaluation at a single point) or a p*d matrix (for p simultaneous evaluations of the criterion at p different points). |
model |
An object of class |
T |
Array containing one or several thresholds. |
method.param |
Scalar tolerance around the targets T. |
targeted MSE value.
When the argument x
is a vector the function returns a scalar.
When the argument x
is a p*d matrix the function returns a vector of size p.
Victor Picheny (INRA, Toulouse, France)
David Ginsbourger (IDIAP Martigny and University of Bern, Switzerland)
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Picheny V., Ginsbourger D., Roustant O., Haftka R.T., (2010) Adaptive designs of experiments for accurate approximation of a target region, J. Mech. Des. vol. 132(7)
Picheny V. (2009) Improving accuracy and compensating for uncertainty in surrogate modeling, Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida and Ecole Nationale Superieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne
#tmse_optim set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(40,80) #thresholds testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") x <- c(0.5,0.4)#one evaluation of the tmse criterion tmse_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) tmse.grid <- tmse_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) z.grid <- matrix(tmse.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, doe points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,25,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.max(tmse.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of tmse criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
#tmse_optim set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- c(40,80) #thresholds testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") x <- c(0.5,0.4)#one evaluation of the tmse criterion tmse_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) tmse.grid <- tmse_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) z.grid <- matrix(tmse.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, doe points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,25,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.max(tmse.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of tmse criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
Evaluation of the Two-Sided Expected Exceedance criterion. To be used in optimization routines, like in max_infill_criterion
.
tsee_optim(x, model, T)
tsee_optim(x, model, T)
x |
Input vector at which one wants to evaluate the criterion. This argument can be either a vector of size d (for an evaluation at a single point) or a p*d matrix (for p simultaneous evaluations of the criterion at p different points). |
model |
An object of class |
T |
Target value (scalar). |
tsee criterion.
When the argument x
is a vector the function returns a scalar.
When the argument x
is a p*d matrix the function returns a vector of size p.
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Yann Richet (IRSN, France)
#tsee_optim set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") x <- c(0.5,0.4)#one evaluation of the tsee criterion tsee_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) tsee.grid <- tsee_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) z.grid <- matrix(tsee.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, doe points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,25,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.max(tsee.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of tsee criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
#tsee_optim set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") x <- c(0.5,0.4)#one evaluation of the tsee criterion tsee_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) tsee.grid <- tsee_optim(x=x,T=T,model=model) z.grid <- matrix(tsee.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, doe points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,25,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.max(tsee.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of tsee criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
Evaluation of the parallel Vorob'ev criterion for some candidate points. To be used in optimization routines, like in max_vorob_parallel
.
To avoid numerical instabilities, the new points are evaluated only if they are not too close to an existing observation, or if there is some observation noise.
The criterion is the integral of the posterior Vorob'ev uncertainty.
vorob_optim_parallel(x, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, alpha, current.vorob, penalisation=NULL,typeEx=">")
vorob_optim_parallel(x, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, alpha, current.vorob, penalisation=NULL,typeEx=">")
x |
Input vector of size batchsize*d at which one wants to evaluate the criterion. This argument is NOT a matrix. |
integration.points |
p*d matrix of points for numerical integration in the X space. |
integration.weights |
Vector of size p corresponding to the weights of these integration points. |
intpoints.oldmean |
Vector of size p corresponding to the kriging mean at the integration points before adding the batchsize points |
intpoints.oldsd |
Vector of size p corresponding to the kriging standard deviation at the integration points before adding the batchsize points |
precalc.data |
List containing useful data to compute quickly the updated kriging variance. This list can be generated using the |
model |
Object of class |
T |
Target value (scalar). The criterion CANNOT be used with multiple thresholds. |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar value of the noise variance for the new observations. |
batchsize |
Number of points to sample simultaneously. The sampling criterion will return batchsize points at a time for sampling. |
alpha |
The Vorob'ev threshold. |
current.vorob |
Current value of the vorob criterion (before adding new observations) |
penalisation |
Optional penalization constant for type I errors. If equal to zero, computes the Type II criterion. |
typeEx |
A character (">" or "<") identifying the type of excursion |
The first argument x
has been chosen to be a vector of size batchsize*d (and not a matrix with batchsize rows and d columns) so that an optimizer like genoud can optimize it easily.
For example if d=2, batchsize=3 and x=c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6)
, we will evaluate the parallel criterion at the three points (0.1,0.2),(0.3,0.4) and (0.5,0.6).
Parallel vorob value
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Dario Azzimonti (IDSIA, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Ginsbouger D., Bect J., Molchanov I. (2013) Estimating and quantifying uncertainties on level sets using the Vorob'ev expectation and deviation with gaussian process models mODa 10, Advances in Model-Oriented Design and Analysis, Contributions to Statistics, pp 35-43
Chevalier C. (2013) Fast uncertainty reduction strategies relying on Gaussian process models Ph.D Thesis, University of Bern
Azzimonti, D., Ginsbourger, D., Chevalier, C., Bect, J., and Richet, Y. (2018). Adaptive design of experiments for conservative estimation of excursion sets. Under revision. Preprint at hal-01379642
EGIparallel
, max_vorob_parallel
#vorob_optim_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=50,distrib="vorob",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights alpha <- obj$alpha pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) batchsize <- 4 x <- c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8) #one evaluation of the vorob_optim_parallel criterion #we calculate the expectation of the future "vorob" uncertainty #when 4 points are added to the doe #the 4 points are (0.1,0.2) , (0.3,0.4), (0.5,0.6), (0.7,0.8) vorob_optim_parallel(x=x,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,alpha=alpha,current.vorob=Inf) #the function max_vorob_parallel will help to find the optimum: #ie: the batch of 4 minimizing the expectation of the future uncertainty
#vorob_optim_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=50,distrib="vorob",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights alpha <- obj$alpha pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) batchsize <- 4 x <- c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8) #one evaluation of the vorob_optim_parallel criterion #we calculate the expectation of the future "vorob" uncertainty #when 4 points are added to the doe #the 4 points are (0.1,0.2) , (0.3,0.4), (0.5,0.6), (0.7,0.8) vorob_optim_parallel(x=x,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,alpha=alpha,current.vorob=Inf) #the function max_vorob_parallel will help to find the optimum: #ie: the batch of 4 minimizing the expectation of the future uncertainty
Evaluation of the Vorob'ev criterion for some candidate points, assuming that some other points are also going to be evaluated. To be used in optimization routines, like in max_vorob_parallel
.
To avoid numerical instabilities, the new points are evaluated only if they are not too close to an existing observation, or if there is some observation noise.
The criterion is the integral of the posterior Vorob'ev uncertainty.
vorob_optim_parallel2(x, other.points, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, alpha, current.vorob, penalisation = NULL, typeEx = ">")
vorob_optim_parallel2(x, other.points, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, alpha, current.vorob, penalisation = NULL, typeEx = ">")
x |
Input vector of size d at which one wants to evaluate the criterion. This argument corresponds to only ONE point. |
other.points |
Vector giving the other |
integration.points |
p*d matrix of points for numerical integration in the X space. |
integration.weights |
Vector of size p corresponding to the weights of these integration points. |
intpoints.oldmean |
Vector of size p corresponding to the kriging mean at the integration points before adding |
intpoints.oldsd |
Vector of size p corresponding to the kriging standard deviation at the integration points before adding |
precalc.data |
List containing useful data to compute quickly the updated kriging variance. This list can be generated using the |
model |
Object of class |
T |
Target value (scalar). The criterion CANNOT be used with multiple thresholds. |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar value of the noise variance of the new observations. |
batchsize |
Number of points to sample simultaneously. The sampling criterion will return batchsize points at a time for sampling. |
alpha |
The Vorob'ev threshold. |
current.vorob |
Current value of the vorob criterion (before adding new observations) |
penalisation |
Optional penalization constant for type I errors. If equal to zero, computes the Type II criterion. |
typeEx |
A character (">" or "<") identifying the type of excursion |
The first argument x
has been chosen to be a vector of size d so that an optimizer like genoud can optimize it easily.
The second argument other.points
is a vector of size (batchsize-1)*d corresponding to the batchsize-1 other points.
Parallel Vorob'ev value
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Dario Azzimonti (IDSIA, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Ginsbouger D., Bect J., Molchanov I. (2013) Estimating and quantifying uncertainties on level sets using the Vorob'ev expectation and deviation with gaussian process models mODa 10, Advances in Model-Oriented Design and Analysis, Contributions to Statistics, pp 35-43
Chevalier C. (2013) Fast uncertainty reduction strategies relying on Gaussian process models Ph.D Thesis, University of Bern
EGIparallel
, max_vorob_parallel
#vorob_optim_parallel2 set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=50,distrib="vorob",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights alpha <- obj$alpha pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) batchsize <- 4 other.points <- c(0.7,0.5,0.5,0.9,0.9,0.8) x <- c(0.1,0.2) #one evaluation of the vorob_optim_parallel criterion2 #we calculate the expectation of the future "vorob" uncertainty when #1+3 points are added to the doe #the 1+3 points are (0.1,0.2) and (0.7,0.5), (0.5,0.9), (0.9,0.8) vorob_optim_parallel2(x=x,other.points,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,alpha=alpha,current.vorob=Inf) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) vorob_parallel.grid <- apply(X=x,FUN=vorob_optim_parallel2,MARGIN=1,other.points, integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,alpha=alpha,current.vorob=Inf) z.grid <- matrix(vorob_parallel.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, doe points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) points(matrix(other.points,ncol=2,byrow=TRUE), col="red", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.min(vorob_parallel.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of vorob_parallel criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
#vorob_optim_parallel2 set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=50,distrib="vorob",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights alpha <- obj$alpha pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) batchsize <- 4 other.points <- c(0.7,0.5,0.5,0.9,0.9,0.8) x <- c(0.1,0.2) #one evaluation of the vorob_optim_parallel criterion2 #we calculate the expectation of the future "vorob" uncertainty when #1+3 points are added to the doe #the 1+3 points are (0.1,0.2) and (0.7,0.5), (0.5,0.9), (0.9,0.8) vorob_optim_parallel2(x=x,other.points,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,alpha=alpha,current.vorob=Inf) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) vorob_parallel.grid <- apply(X=x,FUN=vorob_optim_parallel2,MARGIN=1,other.points, integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,alpha=alpha,current.vorob=Inf) z.grid <- matrix(vorob_parallel.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, doe points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) points(matrix(other.points,ncol=2,byrow=TRUE), col="red", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) i.best <- which.min(vorob_parallel.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of vorob_parallel criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
Evaluation of the Vorob'ev threshold given an excursion probability vector. This threshold is such that the volume of the set (x : pn(x) > threshold) is equal to the integral of pn.
vorob_threshold(pn)
vorob_threshold(pn)
pn |
Input vector of arbitrary size containing the excursion probabilities pn(x). |
In this function, all the points x are supposed to be equaly weighted.
a scalar: the Vorob'ev thresold
Clement Chevalier (University of Neuchatel, Switzerland)
Chevalier C., Ginsbouger D., Bect J., Molchanov I. (2013) Estimating and quantifying uncertainties on level sets using the Vorob'ev expectation and deviation with gaussian process models mODa 10, Advances in Model-Oriented Design and Analysis, Contributions to Statistics, pp 35-43
Chevalier C. (2013) Fast uncertainty reduction strategies relying on Gaussian process models Ph.D Thesis, University of Bern
max_vorob_parallel
, vorob_optim_parallel
#vorob_threshold set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ## Not run: ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=50,distrib="sobol") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) pn <- pnorm((pred$mean-T)/pred$sd) vorob_threshold(pn) ## End(Not run)
#vorob_threshold set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ## Not run: ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=50,distrib="sobol") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) pn <- pnorm((pred$mean-T)/pred$sd) vorob_threshold(pn) ## End(Not run)
Compute the volume criterion
vorobVol_optim_parallel(x, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, alpha, current.crit, typeEx = ">")
vorobVol_optim_parallel(x, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, alpha, current.crit, typeEx = ">")
x |
vector of size |
integration.points |
|
integration.weights |
vector of size |
intpoints.oldmean |
Vector of size |
intpoints.oldsd |
Vector of size |
precalc.data |
List containing useful data to compute quickly the updated kriging variance. This list can be generated using the |
model |
a km Model |
T |
threshold |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar with the noise variance at the new observation |
batchsize |
size of the batch of new points |
alpha |
threshold on pn obtained with conservative estimates |
current.crit |
starting value for criterion |
typeEx |
a character (">" or "<") identifying the type of excursion |
The value of the criterion at x
.
Dario Azzimonti (IDSIA, Switzerland)
Azzimonti, D. and Ginsbourger, D. (2018). Estimating orthant probabilities of high dimensional Gaussian vectors with an application to set estimation. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 27(2), 255-267.
Azzimonti, D. (2016). Contributions to Bayesian set estimation relying on random field priors. PhD thesis, University of Bern.
Azzimonti, D., Ginsbourger, D., Chevalier, C., Bect, J., and Richet, Y. (2018). Adaptive design of experiments for conservative estimation of excursion sets. Under revision. Preprint at hal-01379642
Chevalier, C., Bect, J., Ginsbourger, D., Vazquez, E., Picheny, V., and Richet, Y. (2014). Fast kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set. Technometrics, 56(4):455-465.
EGIparallel
, max_futureVol_parallel
#vorobVol_optim_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=50,distrib="vorob",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights # alpha, the pn threshold should be computed with conservativeEstimate # Here it is fixed at 0.992364 alpha <- 0.992364 ## Not run: # You can compute it with the following code CE_design=as.matrix (randtoolbox::sobol (n = 500*model@d, dim = model@d)) colnames(CE_design) <- colnames(model@X) CE_pred = predict.km(object = model, newdata = CE_design, type = "UK",cov.compute = TRUE) CE_pred$cov <- CE_pred$cov +1e-7*diag(nrow = nrow(CE_pred$cov),ncol = ncol(CE_pred$cov)) Cestimate <- anMC::conservativeEstimate(alpha = 0.95, pred=CE_pred, design=CE_design, threshold=T, pn = NULL, type = ">", verb = 1, lightReturn = TRUE, algo = "GANMC") alpha <- Cestimate$lvs ## End(Not run) pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) batchsize <- 4 x <- c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8) #one evaluation of the vorob_optim_parallel criterion #we calculate the expectation of the future "vorob" uncertainty #when 4 points are added to the doe #the 4 points are (0.1,0.2) , (0.3,0.4), (0.5,0.6), (0.7,0.8) vorobVol_optim_parallel(x=x,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,alpha=alpha) #the function max_futureVol_parallel will help to find the optimum: #ie: the batch of 4 maximizing the expectation of the future # uncertainty (future volume of the Vorob'ev quantile)
#vorobVol_optim_parallel set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=50,distrib="vorob",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights # alpha, the pn threshold should be computed with conservativeEstimate # Here it is fixed at 0.992364 alpha <- 0.992364 ## Not run: # You can compute it with the following code CE_design=as.matrix (randtoolbox::sobol (n = 500*model@d, dim = model@d)) colnames(CE_design) <- colnames(model@X) CE_pred = predict.km(object = model, newdata = CE_design, type = "UK",cov.compute = TRUE) CE_pred$cov <- CE_pred$cov +1e-7*diag(nrow = nrow(CE_pred$cov),ncol = ncol(CE_pred$cov)) Cestimate <- anMC::conservativeEstimate(alpha = 0.95, pred=CE_pred, design=CE_design, threshold=T, pn = NULL, type = ">", verb = 1, lightReturn = TRUE, algo = "GANMC") alpha <- Cestimate$lvs ## End(Not run) pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) batchsize <- 4 x <- c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7,0.8) #one evaluation of the vorob_optim_parallel criterion #we calculate the expectation of the future "vorob" uncertainty #when 4 points are added to the doe #the 4 points are (0.1,0.2) , (0.3,0.4), (0.5,0.6), (0.7,0.8) vorobVol_optim_parallel(x=x,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,alpha=alpha) #the function max_futureVol_parallel will help to find the optimum: #ie: the batch of 4 maximizing the expectation of the future # uncertainty (future volume of the Vorob'ev quantile)
Compute the volume criterion. Useful for optimization routines.
vorobVol_optim_parallel2(x, other.points, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, alpha, current.crit, typeEx = ">")
vorobVol_optim_parallel2(x, other.points, integration.points, integration.weights = NULL, intpoints.oldmean, intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data, model, T, new.noise.var = NULL, batchsize, alpha, current.crit, typeEx = ">")
x |
One point where to evaluate the criterion |
other.points |
remaining points of the batch |
integration.points |
|
integration.weights |
vector of size |
intpoints.oldmean |
Vector of size |
intpoints.oldsd |
Vector of size |
precalc.data |
List containing useful data to compute quickly the updated kriging variance. This list can be generated using the |
model |
a km Model |
T |
threshold |
new.noise.var |
Optional scalar with the noise variance at the new observation |
batchsize |
size of the batch of new points |
alpha |
threshold on pn obtained with conservative estimates |
current.crit |
starting value for criterion |
typeEx |
a character (">" or "<") identifying the type of excursion |
The value of the criterion at x
.
Dario Azzimonti (IDSIA, Switzerland)
Azzimonti, D. and Ginsbourger, D. (2018). Estimating orthant probabilities of high dimensional Gaussian vectors with an application to set estimation. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 27(2), 255-267.
Azzimonti, D. (2016). Contributions to Bayesian set estimation relying on random field priors. PhD thesis, University of Bern.
Azzimonti, D., Ginsbourger, D., Chevalier, C., Bect, J., and Richet, Y. (2018). Adaptive design of experiments for conservative estimation of excursion sets. Under revision. Preprint at hal-01379642
Chevalier, C., Bect, J., Ginsbourger, D., Vazquez, E., Picheny, V., and Richet, Y. (2014). Fast kriging-based stepwise uncertainty reduction with application to the identification of an excursion set. Technometrics, 56(4):455-465.
EGIparallel
, max_futureVol_parallel
#vorobVol_optim_parallel2 set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=50,distrib="vorob",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights # alpha, the pn threshold should be computed with conservativeEstimate # Here it is fixed at 0.992364 alpha <- 0.992364 ## Not run: # You can compute it with the following code CE_design=as.matrix (randtoolbox::sobol (n = 500*model@d, dim = model@d)) colnames(CE_design) <- colnames(model@X) CE_pred = predict.km(object = model, newdata = CE_design, type = "UK",cov.compute = TRUE) CE_pred$cov <- CE_pred$cov +1e-7*diag(nrow = nrow(CE_pred$cov),ncol = ncol(CE_pred$cov)) Cestimate <- anMC::conservativeEstimate(alpha = 0.95, pred=CE_pred, design=CE_design, threshold=T, pn = NULL, type = ">", verb = 1, lightReturn = TRUE, algo = "GANMC") alpha <- Cestimate$lvs ## End(Not run) pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) batchsize <- 4 other.points <- c(0.7,0.5,0.5,0.9,0.9,0.8) x <- c(0.1,0.2) #one evaluation of the vorobVol_optim_parallel criterion2 #we calculate the expectation of the future volume vorobev uncertainty when #1+3 points are added to the doe #the 1+3 points are (0.1,0.2) and (0.7,0.5), (0.5,0.9), (0.9,0.8) vorobVol_optim_parallel2(x=x,other.points=other.points,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,alpha=alpha) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) vorobVol_parallel.grid <- apply(X=x,FUN=vorobVol_optim_parallel2,MARGIN=1,other.points=other.points, integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,alpha=alpha) z.grid <- matrix(vorobVol_parallel.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, doe points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) points(matrix(other.points,ncol=2,byrow=TRUE), col="red", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) # Note that we want to maximize this criterion. i.best <- which.max(vorobVol_parallel.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of vorobVol_parallel criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")
#vorobVol_optim_parallel2 set.seed(9) N <- 20 #number of observations T <- 80 #threshold testfun <- branin #a 20 points initial design design <- data.frame( matrix(runif(2*N),ncol=2) ) response <- testfun(design) #km object with matern3_2 covariance #params estimated by ML from the observations model <- km(formula=~., design = design, response = response,covtype="matern3_2") ###we need to compute some additional arguments: #integration points, and current kriging means and variances at these points integcontrol <- list(n.points=50,distrib="vorob",init.distrib="MC") obj <- integration_design(integcontrol=integcontrol, lower=c(0,0),upper=c(1,1),model=model,T=T) integration.points <- obj$integration.points integration.weights <- obj$integration.weights # alpha, the pn threshold should be computed with conservativeEstimate # Here it is fixed at 0.992364 alpha <- 0.992364 ## Not run: # You can compute it with the following code CE_design=as.matrix (randtoolbox::sobol (n = 500*model@d, dim = model@d)) colnames(CE_design) <- colnames(model@X) CE_pred = predict.km(object = model, newdata = CE_design, type = "UK",cov.compute = TRUE) CE_pred$cov <- CE_pred$cov +1e-7*diag(nrow = nrow(CE_pred$cov),ncol = ncol(CE_pred$cov)) Cestimate <- anMC::conservativeEstimate(alpha = 0.95, pred=CE_pred, design=CE_design, threshold=T, pn = NULL, type = ">", verb = 1, lightReturn = TRUE, algo = "GANMC") alpha <- Cestimate$lvs ## End(Not run) pred <- predict_nobias_km(object=model,newdata=integration.points, type="UK",se.compute=TRUE) intpoints.oldmean <- pred$mean ; intpoints.oldsd<-pred$sd #another precomputation precalc.data <- precomputeUpdateData(model,integration.points) batchsize <- 4 other.points <- c(0.7,0.5,0.5,0.9,0.9,0.8) x <- c(0.1,0.2) #one evaluation of the vorobVol_optim_parallel criterion2 #we calculate the expectation of the future volume vorobev uncertainty when #1+3 points are added to the doe #the 1+3 points are (0.1,0.2) and (0.7,0.5), (0.5,0.9), (0.9,0.8) vorobVol_optim_parallel2(x=x,other.points=other.points,integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,alpha=alpha) n.grid <- 20 #you can run it with 100 x.grid <- y.grid <- seq(0,1,length=n.grid) x <- expand.grid(x.grid, y.grid) vorobVol_parallel.grid <- apply(X=x,FUN=vorobVol_optim_parallel2,MARGIN=1,other.points=other.points, integration.points=integration.points, integration.weights=integration.weights, intpoints.oldmean=intpoints.oldmean,intpoints.oldsd=intpoints.oldsd, precalc.data=precalc.data,T=T,model=model, batchsize=batchsize,alpha=alpha) z.grid <- matrix(vorobVol_parallel.grid, n.grid, n.grid) #plots: contour of the criterion, doe points and new point image(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,col=grey.colors(10)) contour(x=x.grid,y=y.grid,z=z.grid,15,add=TRUE) points(design, col="black", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) points(matrix(other.points,ncol=2,byrow=TRUE), col="red", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=2) # Note that we want to maximize this criterion. i.best <- which.max(vorobVol_parallel.grid) points(x[i.best,], col="blue", pch=17, lwd=4,cex=3) #plots the real (unknown in practice) curve f(x)=T testfun.grid <- apply(x,1,testfun) z.grid.2 <- matrix(testfun.grid, n.grid, n.grid) contour(x.grid,y.grid,z.grid.2,levels=T,col="blue",add=TRUE,lwd=5) title("Contour lines of vorobVol_parallel criterion (black) and of f(x)=T (blue)")