The package FENmlm
estimates maximum likelihood (ML)
models with fixed-effects. The function femlm
is the
workhorse of the package: it performs efficient ML estimations with
any number of fixed-effects and also allows for non-linear in
parameters right-hand-sides. Four likelihood models are supported:
Poisson, Negative Binomial, Gaussian (equivalent to OLS) and Logit.
The standard-errors of the estimates can be very easily clustered (up to four-way).
Two specific functions are implemented to seamlessly export the
results of multiple estimations into either a data.frame (function
res2table
), or a Latex table of “article-like” quality
(function res2tex
).
The main features of the package are illustrated in this vignette. For the theory behind this method, see Berge (2018), “Efficient estimation of maximum likelihood models with multiple fixed-effects: the R package FENmlm.” CREA Discussion Papers, 13 (https://github.com/lrberge/fixest/blob/master/_DOCS/FENmlm_paper.pdf).
UPDATE: this package is deprecated, please use fixest now.
This example deals with international trade, which is a setup that usually requires performing estimations with many fixed-effects. We estimate a very simple gravity model in which we are interested in finding out the negative effect of geographic distance on trade. The sample data consists of European trade extracted from Eurostat. Let’s load the data contained in the package:
library(FENmlm)
#> The package 'FENmlm' is not maintained any more. Please use package 'fixest' instead (which greatly extends its functionalities).
data(trade)
This data is a sample of bilateral importations between EU15 countries from 2007 and 2016. The data is further broken down according to 20 product categories. Here is a sample of the data:
Destination | Origin | Product | Year | dist_km | Euros |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LU | BE | 1 | 2007 | 139.6199 | 2.966697 |
BE | LU | 1 | 2007 | 139.6199 | 6.755030 |
LU | BE | 2 | 2007 | 139.6199 | 57.078782 |
BE | LU | 2 | 2007 | 139.6199 | 7.117406 |
LU | BE | 3 | 2007 | 139.6199 | 17.379821 |
BE | LU | 3 | 2007 | 139.6199 | 2.622254 |
The dependent variable of the estimation will be the level of trade between two countries while the independent variable is the geographic distance between the two countries. To obtain the elasticity of geographic distance net of the effects of the four clusters, we estimate the following:
E(Tradei, j, p, t) = γiExporter × γjImporter × γpProduct × γtYear × Distanceijβ,
where the subscripts i, j, p and t stand respectively for the exporting country, the importing country, the type of product and the year, and the γvc are fixed-effects for these groups. Here β is the elasticity of interest.
Note that when you use the Poisson/Negative Binomial families, this relationship is in fact linear because the right hand side is exponentialized to avoid negative values for the Poisson parameter. This leads to the equivalent relation:1
E(Tradei, j, p, t) = exp (γiExporter + γjImporter + γpProduct + γtYear + β × ln Distanceij).
The estimation of this model using a Poisson likelihood is as follows:
gravity_results <- femlm(Euros ~ log(dist_km), trade, family = "poisson", cluster = c("Origin", "Destination", "Product", "Year"))
Note that alternatively you could have done the same estimation
without the argument cluster
, by inserting the
fixed-effects directly in the formula with a pipe. Further, you can
avoid the argument family
since the Poisson model is the
default:
The results can be shown directly with the print
method:
print(gravity_results)
#> ML estimation, family = Poisson, Dep. Var.: Euros
#> Observations: 38,325
#> Cluster sizes: Origin: 15, Destination: 15, Product: 20, Year: 10
#> Standard-errors type: Standard
#> Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
#> log(dist_km) -1.5276 0.001925 -793.65 < 2.2e-16 ***
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#> BIC: -768,493.77 Pseudo-R2: 0.74743
#> Log-likelihood: 1,538,211.80 Squared Cor.: 0.61201
The print
reports the coefficient estimates and
standard-errors as well as some other information. Among the quality of
fit information, the squared-correlation corresponds to the correlation
between the dependent variable and the expected predictor; it reflects
somehow to the idea of R-square in OLS estimations.
The last line reports the convergence status of the optimization
algorithm (the function nlminb
from the package
stats
). In the, rare, event of no convergence, see the
troubleshooting section of this Vignette to explore the possible causes
and solutions.
To cluster the standard-errors, we can simply use the argument
se
of the summary
method. Let’s say we want to
cluster the standard-errors according to the first two clusters
(i.e. the Origin and Destination variables). Then we
just have to do:
summary(gravity_results, se = "twoway")
#> ML estimation, family = Poisson, Dep. Var.: Euros
#> Observations: 38,325
#> Cluster sizes: Origin: 15, Destination: 15, Product: 20, Year: 10
#> Standard-errors type: Two-way (Origin & Destination)
#> Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
#> log(dist_km) -1.5276 0.12627 -12.098 < 2.2e-16 ***
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#> BIC: -768,493.77 Pseudo-R2: 0.74743
#> Log-likelihood: 1,538,211.80 Squared Cor.: 0.61201
The clustering can be done on one (se="cluster"
), two
(se="twoway"
), three (se="threeway"
) or up to
four (se="fourway"
) variables. If the estimation includes
fixed-effects, then by default the clustering will be done using these
fixed-effects, in the original order. This is why the Origin
and Destination variables were used for the two-way clustering
in the previous example. If, instead, you wanted to perform one-way
clustering on the Product variable, you need to use the
argument cluster
:
# Equivalent ways of clustering the SEs:
# - using the vector:
summary(gravity_results, se = "cluster", cluster = trade$Product)
#> ML estimation, family = Poisson, Dep. Var.: Euros
#> Observations: 38,325
#> Cluster sizes: Origin: 15, Destination: 15, Product: 20, Year: 10
#> Standard-errors type: Clustered
#> Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
#> log(dist_km) -1.5276 0.095772 -15.951 < 2.2e-16 ***
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#> BIC: -768,493.77 Pseudo-R2: 0.74743
#> Log-likelihood: 1,538,211.80 Squared Cor.: 0.61201
# - by reference (only possible because Product has been used as a cluster in the estimation):
summary(gravity_results, se = "cluster", cluster = "Product")
#> ML estimation, family = Poisson, Dep. Var.: Euros
#> Observations: 38,325
#> Cluster sizes: Origin: 15, Destination: 15, Product: 20, Year: 10
#> Standard-errors type: Clustered (Product)
#> Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
#> log(dist_km) -1.5276 0.095772 -15.951 < 2.2e-16 ***
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#> BIC: -768,493.77 Pseudo-R2: 0.74743
#> Log-likelihood: 1,538,211.80 Squared Cor.: 0.61201
Note that you can always cluster the standard-errors, even when the
estimation contained no fixed-effect. Buth then you need to use the
argument cluster
and give explicitely the data to cluster
with:
gravity_simple = femlm(Euros ~ log(dist_km), trade)
summary(gravity_simple, se = "twoway", cluster = trade[, c("Origin", "Destination")])
#> ML estimation, family = Poisson, Dep. Var.: Euros
#> Observations: 38,325
#> Standard-errors type: Two-way
#> Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
#> (Intercept) 10.8940 1.086600 10.0250 < 2.2e-16 ***
#> log(dist_km) -1.0289 0.152658 -6.7401 1.58e-11 ***
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#> BIC: -2,492,169.10 Pseudo-R2: 0.18101
#> Log-likelihood: 4,984,380.42 Squared Cor.: 0.05511
To use other likelihood models, you simply have to use the argument
family
. The fixed-effects Negative Binomial estimation
is:
gravity_results_negbin <- femlm(Euros ~ log(dist_km)|Origin+Destination+Product+Year, trade, family = "negbin")
Now to estimate the same relationship with the Gaussian likelihood, we need to put the left hand side in logarithm (since the right-hand-side is not exponentialized):
gravity_results_gaussian <- femlm(log(Euros) ~ log(dist_km)|Origin+Destination+Product+Year, trade, family = "gaussian")
Note that the estimates with the Gaussian likelihood are equivalent to the estimates with Ordinary Least Squares.
Now let’s say that we want a compact overview of the results of
several estimations. The best way is to use the function
res2table
. This function summarizes the results of several
femlm
estimations into a data.frame. To see the
fixed-effects results with the three different likelihoods, we just have
to type:
res2table(gravity_results, gravity_results_negbin, gravity_results_gaussian, se = "twoway", subtitles = c("Poisson", "Negative Binomial", "Gaussian"))
Poisson | Negative Binomial | Gaussian | |
---|---|---|---|
Dependent Var.: | Euros | Euros | log(Euros) |
log(dist_km) | -1.5276*** (0.1263) | -1.7276*** (0.1431) | -2.1697*** (0.1655) |
Overdispersion: | 0.845552 | ||
Fixed-Effects: | ——————- | ——————- | ——————- |
Origin | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Destination | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Product | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Year | Yes | Yes | Yes |
___________________ | ___________________ | ___________________ | ___________________ |
Family: | Poisson | Neg. Bin. | Gaussian |
Observations | 38,325 | 38,325 | 38,325 |
Squared-Correlation | 0.612 | 0.474 | 0.706 |
Adj-pseudo R2 | 0.74743 | 0.1622 | 0.23583 |
Log-Likelihood | -768,493.77 | -130,359.17 | -75,682.39 |
BIC | 1,537,599.67 | 261,341.03 | 151,976.92 |
We added the argument se="twoway"
to cluster the
standard-errors for all estimations. As can be seen this function gives
an overview of the estimates and standard-errors, as well as some
quality of fit measures. The argument subtitles
is used to
add information on each estimation column.
In the previous example, we directly added the estimation results as
arguments of the function res2table
. But the function also
accepts lists of estimations. Let’s give an example. Say you want to see
the influence of the introduction of fixed-effects on the estimate of
the elasticity of distance. You can do it with the following code:
gravity_subcluster = list()
all_clusters = c("Year", "Destination", "Origin", "Product")
for(i in 1:4){
gravity_subcluster[[i]] = femlm(Euros ~ log(dist_km), trade, cluster = all_clusters[1:i])
}
The previous code performs 4 estimations with an increasing number of
fixed-effects and store their results into the list named
gravity_subcluster
. To show the results of all 4
estimations, it’s easy:
model 1 | model 2 | model 3 | model 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
log(dist_km) | -1.0293*** (0.1527) | -1.2256*** (0.1975) | -1.5173*** (0.1238) | -1.5276*** (0.1263) |
Fixed-Effects: | ——————- | ——————- | ——————- | ——————- |
Year | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Destination | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Origin | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Product | No | No | No | Yes |
___________________ | ___________________ | ___________________ | ___________________ | ___________________ |
Observations | 38,325 | 38,325 | 38,325 | 38,325 |
Squared-Correlation | 0.057 | 0.164 | 0.385 | 0.612 |
Adj-pseudo R2 | 0.18423 | 0.35047 | 0.58023 | 0.74743 |
Log-Likelihood | -2,482,334.64 | -1,976,479.31 | -1,277,291.27 | -768,493.77 |
BIC | 4,964,785.39 | 3,953,222.48 | 2,554,994.15 | 1,537,599.67 |
We have a view of the 5 estimations, all reporting two-way clustered
standard-errors thanks to the use of the arguments se
and
cluster
.
So far we have seen how to report the results of multiple estimations
on the R console. Now, with the function res2tex
, we can
export the results to high quality Latex tables. The function
res2tex
works exactly as the function
res2table
, it takes any number of femlm
estimations. By default, it reports Latex code on the R console:
res2tex(gravity_subcluster, se = "twoway", cluster = trade[, c("Origin", "Destination")])
#> \global\long\def\sym#1{\ifmmode^{#1}\else\ensuremath{^{#1}}\fi}
#> \begin{table}[htbp]\centering
#> \caption{no title}
#> \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
#> & & & & \tabularnewline
#> \hline
#> \hline
#> Dependent Variable:&\multicolumn{4}{c}{Euros}\\
#> Model:&(1)&(2)&(3)&(4)\\
#> \hline
#> \emph{Variables}\tabularnewline
#> log(dist_km)&-1\sym{***}&-1\sym{***}&-2\sym{***}&-2\sym{***}\\
#> &(0.1527)&(0.1975)&(0.1238)&(0.1263)\\
#> \hline
#> \emph{Fixed-Effects}& & & & \\
#> Year&Yes&Yes&Yes&Yes\\
#> Destination&No&Yes&Yes&Yes\\
#> Origin&No&No&Yes&Yes\\
#> Product&No&No&No&Yes\\
#> \hline
#> \emph{Fit statistics}& & & & \\
#> Observations& 38,325&38,325&38,325&38,325\\
#> Adj-pseudo $R^2$ &0.18423&0.35047&0.58023&0.74743\\
#> Log-Likelihood & -2,482,334.64&-1,976,479.31&-1,277,291.27&-768,493.77\\
#> BIC & 4,964,785.39&3,953,222.48&2,554,994.15&1,537,599.67\\
#> \hline
#> \hline
#> \multicolumn{5}{l}{\emph{Two-way standard-errors in parenthesis. Signif Codes: ***: 0.01, **: 0.05, *: 0.1}}\\
#> \end{tabular}
#> \end{table}
This function has many optional arguments. The user can export the
Latex table directly into a file (argument file
), add a
title (arg. title
) and a label to the table (arg.
label
).
The coefficients can be renamed easily (arg. dict
), some
can be dropped (arg. drop
) and they can be easily reordered
with regular expressions (arg. order
).
The significance codes can easily be changed (arg.
signifCode
) and all quality of fit information can be
customized. Among others, the number of fixed-effect per cluster can
also be displayed using the argument showClusterSize
.
Consider the following example of the exportation of two tables:
# we set the dictionary once and for all
myDict = c("log(dist_km)" = "$\\ln (Distance)$", "(Intercept)" = "Constant")
# 1st export: we change the signif code and drop the intercept
res2tex(gravity_subcluster, signifCode = c("a" = 0.01, "b" = 0.05), drop = "Int", dict = myDict, file = "Estimation Table.tex", append = FALSE, title = "First export -- normal Standard-errors")
# 2nd export: clustered S-E + distance as the first coefficient
res2tex(gravity_subcluster, se = "cluster", cluster = trade$Product, order = "dist", dict = myDict, file = "Estimation Table.tex", title = "Second export -- clustered standard-errors (on Product variable)")
In this example, two tables containing the results of the 5
estimations are directly exported in the file “Estimation Table.tex”.
The file is re-created in the first exportation thanks to the argument
append=FALSE
.
To change the variable names in the Latex table, we use the argument
dict
. The variable myDict
is the dictionary we
use to rename the variables, it is simply a named vector. The original
name of the variables correspond to the names of myDict
while the new names of the variables are the values of this vector. Any
variable that matches the names of myDict
will be replaced
by its value. Thus we do not care of the order of appearance of the
variables in the estimation results.
In the first export, the coefficient of the intercept is dropped by
using drop = "Int"
(could be anything such that
grepl(drop[1], "(Intercept)")
is TRUE). In the second, the
coefficient of the distance is put before the intercept (which is kept).
Note that the actions performed by the arguments drop
or
order
are performed before the renaming
takes place with the argument dict
.
To obtain the fixed-effects of the estimation, the function
getFE
must be performed on the results. This function
returns a list containing the fixed-effects for each cluster. The
summary
method helps to have a quick overview:
fixedEffects <- getFE(gravity_results)
summary(fixedEffects)
#> Fixed-effects coefficients.
#> Origin Destination Product Year
#> Number of fixed-effects 15 15 20 10
#> Number of references 0 1 1 1
#> Mean 9.53 3.09 0.0129 0.157
#> Variance 1.63 1.23 1.86 0.0129
#>
#> COEFFICIENTS:
#> Origin: BE LU NL DE GB
#> 9.744 6.414 10.62 10.89 9.934 ... 10 remaining
#> -----
#> Destination: LU BE NL DE IE
#> 0 2.696 3.23 4.322 2.588 ... 10 remaining
#> -----
#> Product: 1 2 3 4 5
#> 0 1.414 0.6562 1.449 -1.521 ... 15 remaining
#> -----
#> Year: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
#> 0 0.06912 0.005226 0.07331 0.163 ... 5 remaining
We can see that the fixed-effects are balanced across clusters.
Indeed, apart from the first cluster, only one fixed-effect per cluster
needs to be set as reference (i.e. fixed to 0) to avoid collinearity
across the fixed-effects of the different clusters. This ensures that
the fixed-effects coefficients can be compared within cluster. Had there
be strictly more than one reference per cluster, their interpretation
would have not been possible at all. If this was the case though, a
warning message would have been prompted. Note that the mean values are
meaningless per se, but give a reference points to which compare the
fixed-effects within a cluster. Let’s look specifically at the
Year
fixed-effects:
fixedEffects$Year
#> 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
#> 0.000000000 0.069122369 0.005225534 0.073308290 0.163013422 0.192605196
#> 2013 2014 2015 2016
#> 0.230629312 0.242605390 0.282800746 0.310325679
Finally, the plot
method helps to distinguish the most
notable fixed-effects:
For each cluster, the fixed-effects are first centered, then sorted, and finally the most notable (i.e. highest and lowest) are reported. The exponential of the coefficient is reported in the right hand side to simplify the interpretation for models with log-link (as the Poisson model). As we can see from the country of destination cluster, trade involving France (FR), Italy (IT) and Germany (DE) as destination countries is more than 2.7 times higher than the EU15 average. Further, the highest heterogeneity come from the product category, where trade in product 4 (dairy products) is roughly 2.7 times the average while product 14 (vegetable plaiting materials) represents a negligible fraction of the average.
Note however that the interpretation of the fixed-effects must be taken with extra care. In particular, here the fixed-effects can be interpreted only because they are perfectly balanced.
Now we present some other features of the package. First the possibility for non-linear in parameter estimation. The use of parallelism to accelerate the estimation. And finally some troobleshooting in case of problems.
The function femlm
also allows to have non-linear in
parameters right-hand-sides (RHS). First an example without
fixed-effects, the one with fixed-effects is given later. Let’s say we
want to estimate the following relation with a Poisson model:
E(zi) = a × xi + b × yi.
In fact, this type of model is non-linear in the context of a Poisson model because the sum is embedded within the log:
E(zi) = exp (log (a × xi + b × yi)).
So let’s estimate such a relation. First we generate the data:
# Generating data:
n = 1000
# x and y: two positive random variables
x = rnorm(n, 1, 5)**2
y = rnorm(n, -1, 5)**2
# E(z) = 2*x + 3*y and some noise
z = rpois(n, 2*x + 3*y) + rpois(n, 1)
base = data.frame(x, y, z)
To estimate the non-linear relationship, we need to use the argument
NL.fml
where we put the non-linear part. We also have to
provide starting values with the argument NL.start
.
Finally, to ensure the RHS can be evaluated in any situation, we add
lower bounds for the parameters with the argument
lower
.
result_NL = femlm(z~0, base, NL.fml = ~ log(a*x + b*y), NL.start = list(a=1, b=1), lower = list(a=0, b=0))
Note that the arguments NL.start
and lower
are named lists. Setting lower = list(a=0, b=0)
means that
the optimization algorithm will never explores parameters for a and b that are lower than 0. The results
obtained can be interpreted similarly to results with linear RHS. We can
see them with a print:
print(result_NL)
#> Non-linear ML estimation, family = Poisson, Dep. Var.: z
#> Observations: 1,000
#> Standard-errors type: Standard
#> Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
#> a 2.0384 0.011144 182.92 < 2.2e-16 ***
#> b 2.9921 0.012829 233.23 < 2.2e-16 ***
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#> BIC: -3,595.77 Pseudo-R2: 0.93459
#> Log-likelihood: 7,219.17 Squared Cor.: 0.99181
We can see that we obtain coefficients close to the generating values.
Adding fixed-effects is identical to the linear case. The user must only be well aware of the functional form. Indeed, the fixed-effects must enter the estimation linearly. This means that the previous equation with one set of fixed-effects writes:
E(zi) = γidi(a × xi + b × yi),
where idi is the class of observation i and γ is the vector of fixed-effects. Here the fixed-effects are in fact linear because in the context of the Poisson model we estimate:
E(zi) = exp (γidi + log (a × xi + b × yi)).
Further, remark that there exists an infinity of values of γ′, a′ and b′ such that:
γk(a × xi + b × yi) = γk′(a′ × xi + b′ × yi), ∀i, k.
An example is γk′ = 2 × γk, a′ = a/2 and b′ = b/2. Thus estimating this relation directly will lead to a problem to uniquely identify the coefficients. To circumvent this problem, we just have to fix one of the coefficient, this will ensure that we uniquely identify them.
Let’s generate this relation:
# the class of each observation
id = sample(20, n, replace = TRUE)
base$id = id
# the vector of fixed-effects
gamma = rnorm(20)**2
# the new vector z_bis
z_bis = rpois(n, gamma[id] * (2*x + 3*y)) + rpois(n, 1)
base$z_bis = z_bis
Now we estimate it with the fixed-effects while fixing one of the coefficients (we fix a to its true value but it could be any value):
# we add the fixed-effect in the formula
result_NL_fe = femlm(z_bis~0|id, base, NL.fml = ~ log(2*x + b*y), NL.start = list(b=1), lower = list(b=0))
# The coef should be around 3
coef(result_NL_fe)
#> b
#> 2.978882
# the gamma and the exponential of the fixed-effects should be similar
rbind(gamma, exp(getFE(result_NL_fe)$id))
#> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
#> gamma 0.1415361 0.004566642 2.173635 0.004215653 0.4888401 0.7229866 0.02089668
#> 0.1580355 0.016142141 2.192493 0.010182497 0.5047119 0.7328707 0.03136660
#> 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
#> gamma 0.3215559 1.033220 0.009370039 1.599764 1.873162 2.858219 3.559306
#> 0.3346130 1.030818 0.018401000 1.603864 1.923171 2.871548 3.595552
#> 15 16 17 18 19 20
#> gamma 0.1656070 0.9312762 5.197757 4.236893 0.1572261 1.505646
#> 0.1601142 0.9407736 5.249692 4.255693 0.1689799 1.511539
As we can see, we obtain the “right” estimates.
The package FENmlm integrates multi-platform parallelism to hasten
the estimation process. To use the multi-core facility, just use the
argument cores
:
# Sample of results:
# 1 core: 2.7s
system.time(femlm(Euros ~ log(dist_km)|Origin+Destination+Product+Year, trade, family = "negbin", cores = 1))
# 2 cores: 1.74s
system.time(femlm(Euros ~ log(dist_km)|Origin+Destination+Product+Year, trade, family = "negbin", cores = 2))
# 4 cores: 1.31s
system.time(femlm(Euros ~ log(dist_km)|Origin+Destination+Product+Year, trade, family = "negbin", cores = 4))
As you can see, the efficiency of increasing the number of cores is not 1 to 1. Two cores do not divide the computing time by 2, nor four cores by 4. However it still reduces significantly the computing time, which might be valuable for large sample estimations.
Although parallelism has been implemented for all likelihood models, the only ones for which it is really efficient are the Negative Binomial and the Logit models.
Indeed, the underlying femlm
code alternate between R
and C and the parallelism has been implemented with the C library
OpenMP. Setting the parallelism with OpenMP incurs “fixed-costs”, and
since there is many back and forth between R and C, these fixed-costs
add up significantly. Thus to be worth, the C-code sections with
parallelism must be “complex”.
Because the Negative Binomial and Logit models are the ones with the most computationnaly intensive C-code chunks, they are the ones that benefit the most from the parallelism.
This section deals with possible error/warning messages stemming from the estimation. There are two identified – possible – problems: collinearity and precision.
The user ought to estimate the coefficient of variables that are
not collinear: neither among each other, neither with
the fixed-effects. Estimation with collinear variables either leads the
algorithm to not converge, either leads to a non invertible Hessian
(leading to the absence of Variance-Covariance matrix for the
coefficients). In such cases, femlm
will raise a warning
and suggest to use the function diagnostic
to spot the
problem.
Let’s take an example in which we want to estimate the coefficient of
a variable which is constant. Of course it makes no sense, so a warning
will be raised suggesting to use the function diagnostic
to
figure out what is wrong.
base_coll = trade
base_coll$constant_variable = 1
res <- femlm(Euros ~ log(dist_km) + constant_variable|Origin+Destination+Product+Year, base_coll)
#> Warning in femlm(Euros ~ log(dist_km) + constant_variable | Origin +
#> Destination + : [femlm]: The optimization algorithm did not converge, the
#> results are not reliable. The information matrix is singular (likely presence
#> of collinearity). Use function diagnostic() to pinpoint collinearity problems.
diagnostic(res)
#> [1] "Variable 'constant_variable' is collinear with cluster Origin."
As we can see, the function diagnostic
spots the
collinear variables and name them. Even in more elaborate cases of
collinearity, the algorithm tries to find out the culprit and informs
the user accordingly.
When there is more than one fixed-effect, the “optimal” fixed-effects
are computed according to a fixed-point algorithm. This algorithm has a
stopping criterion which is equal to the argument
precision.cluster
. By default, it stops when the maximum
absolute difference between two iterations is lower than 10−5.
Further, the algorithm implements a dynamic setting of the precision.
This means that it increases the precision (i.e. sets
precision.cluster
to a lower value) when some
condition occur in order to unblock the optimization algorithm. Thus,
thanks to the dynamic handling of the precision, the default value
precision.cluster
should be enough for most situations.
However, in some very very specific cases (for large data sets where small errors can lead to large differences, or with very “similar” fixed-effects (ie fixed-effects with many overlap)), the algorithm may not converge because the fixed-effects are not computed with enough precision (although they’ll be very close to optimality). Said differently, in such situations the dynamic handling of the precision is not enough because the initial rounding errors when obtaining the cluster coefficients led the optimization algorithm astray.
In such cases, setting the argument precision.cluster
to
a lower value may help the algorithm to converge. Again, such situation
should be rare and the default value should work for the large majority
of cases. Finally, note that increasing the precision leads to
significantly increase the running time of the algorithm.
Since the γ are parameters, I omit to put them in logarithmic form.↩︎