--- title: "Network Plots" author: "Donny Williams" date: "5/20/2020" bibliography: ../inst/REFERENCES.bib output: rmarkdown::html_vignette: toc: yes vignette: > %\VignetteIndexEntry{Network Plots} %\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} --- # Introduction This vignette shows how to make network plots. ### R packages ```{r, eval = FALSE, message=FALSE} # need the developmental version if (!requireNamespace("remotes")) { install.packages("remotes") } # install from github remotes::install_github("donaldRwilliams/BGGM") library(BGGM) library(cowplot) ``` ```{r, echo=FALSE, message=FALSE} library(BGGM) ``` # Estimate For the estimate methods, it is currently only possible detect non-zero relations and the others are set to zero (no connection in the graph). In a future release, it will be possible to define a region of equivalence to directly assess null values. Hence, it is important to note those nodes not connected are not necessarily conditionally independent (absence of evidence is not evidence of absence). ## Fit Model In this example, I use the `bfi` data which consists of 25 variables measureing different aspects of personality. ```{r, eval=FALSE} # data Y <- bfi[,1:25] # fit model fit <- estimate(Y) ``` ## Select Graph The next step is to selec the graph or those relations for which the credible excludes zero ```{r, eval=FALSE} # select the edge set E <- select(fit, cred = 0.95, alternative = "two.sided") ``` `alternative` can be changed to, say, `"greater"` which would then perform a one-sided hypothesis test for postive relations. This is ideal for many applications in psychology, because often **all** relations are expected to be positive. ## Plot Graph Here is the basic plot. This works for any object from `select` (e.g., comparing groups). ```{r, eval=FALSE} plot(E) ``` ![](../man/figures/netplot_1.png) ### Customize Plot The above is `ggplot` that can be futher honed in. Here is an example. ```r # extract communities comm <- substring(colnames(Y), 1, 1) plot(E, # enlarge edges edge_magnify = 5, # cluster nodes groups = comm, # change layout layout = "circle")$plt + # add custom labels scale_color_brewer(breaks = c("A", "C", "E", "N", "O"), labels = c("Agreeableness", "Conscientiousness", "Extraversion", "Neuroticism", "Opennness"), palette = "Set2") ``` ![](../man/figures/netplot_2.png) The `edge_magnify` is a value that is multiplied by the edges, `groups` allows for grouping the variables (e.g., those thought to belong to the same "community" will be the same color), and the `scale_color_brewer` is from the package `ggplot2` (`pallete` controls the color of the `groups`). By default the edge colors are from a color blind palette. This can be changed in `plot` with the arguments `pos_col` (the color for positive edges) and `pos_neg` (the color for negative edges). This is just scratching the surface of possibilities, as essentially any change can be made to the plot. There is lots of support for making nice plots readily available online. #### Layout It is also possible to change the layout. This is done with the **sna** package, which is linked in the documentation for `plot.select` in **BGGM**. Here is an example using `layout = "random"` ```{r, eval=FALSE} plot(E, # enlarge edges edge_magnify = 5, # cluster nodes groups = comm, # change layout layout = "random")$plt + # add custom labels scale_color_brewer(breaks = c("A", "C", "E", "N", "O"), labels = c("Agreeableness", "Conscientiousness", "Extraversion", "Neuroticism", "Opennness"), palette = "Set2") ``` ![](../man/figures/netplot_3.png) # Bayesian Hypothesis Testing The Bayesian hypothesis testing methods offer several advantages, for example, that evidence for the null hypothesis of conditional independence is formally evaluated. As a result, the `explore` method in **BGGM** provides plots for both the conditional dependence and independence structure, in addition to a plot for which the evidence was ambiguous. To highlight this advantage, `ptsd` data is used that has a relatively small sample size. ```r # fit model fit <- explore(Y) E <- select(fit, BF_cut = 3) ``` Then plot the results. Note that there are three plots, so the package **cowplot** is used to combine them into one plot. ```r plts <- plot(E, edge_magnify = 5, groups = comm) plot_grid( plts$H1_plt + ggtitle("Conditional Dependence") + theme(legend.position = "none"), plts$H0_plt + ggtitle("Conditional Independence") + theme(legend.position = "none"), plts$ambiguous_plt + ggtitle("Ambiguous"), nrow = 1, rel_widths = c(1, 1, 1.1) ) ``` ![](../man/figures/hyp_plot.png) As can be seen, there is not evidence for conditional independence for any of the relations. And the ambiguous network makes clear there is large uncertainty as to what or what might not be the "true" network structure. This basic idea of having three adjacency matrices was proposed in @Williams2019_bf. # Note **BGGM** provides a publication ready plot, but it is also limited compared to **qgraph** [@epskamp2012qgraph]. The one advantage of **BGGM** is that all plots are `ggplots` which then allows for combining them rather easily. An example is included in another vignette that shows how to combine several plots made with various methods in **BGGM** # References